Fontbakery Technical Report

If you think a check is flawed or have an idea for a check, please file an issue at https://github.com/fonttools/fontbakery/issues and remember to include a pointer to the repo and branch you're checking.

Summary

💥 ERROR 🔥 FAIL ⚠️ WARN ⏩ SKIP ℹ️ INFO ✅ PASS
0 10 30 123 15 287
0% 3% 8% 34% 4% 79%

Note: The following loglevels were omitted in this report: SKIP, INFO, PASS, DEBUG

Meaning of check results:

If you get ERRORs, please help us improve the tool by reporting them at our issue tracker.

(but other kinds of bug reports and/or feature requests are also always welcome, of course!)

FontBakery version: 0.9.2

Section: Google Fonts

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️

URLs on DESCRIPTION file must not display http(s) prefix.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/description/urls>
⚠️ XanhMono-Italic.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    Please remove the "http(s)://" prefix from the link text "https://github.com/yellow-type-foundry/xanhmono" [code: prefix-found]

⚠️ XanhMono-Regular.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    Please remove the "http(s)://" prefix from the link text "https://github.com/yellow-type-foundry/xanhmono" [code: prefix-found]

Checking OS/2 achVendID.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/vendor_id>
⚠️ XanhMono-Italic.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    OS/2 VendorID value 'NONE' is not yet recognized. If you registered it recently, then it's safe to ignore this warning message. Otherwise, you should set it to your own unique 4 character code, and register it with Microsoft at https://www.microsoft.com/typography/links/vendorlist.aspx [code: unknown]

⚠️ XanhMono-Regular.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    OS/2 VendorID value 'NONE' is not yet recognized. If you registered it recently, then it's safe to ignore this warning message. Otherwise, you should set it to your own unique 4 character code, and register it with Microsoft at https://www.microsoft.com/typography/links/vendorlist.aspx [code: unknown]

Check Google Fonts glyph coverage.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/glyph_coverage>
🔥 XanhMono-Italic.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    Missing required codepoints:

    - 0x02D9 (DOT ABOVE)
    
    
    - 0x016C (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH BREVE)
    
    
    - 0x0237 (LATIN SMALL LETTER DOTLESS J)
    
    
    - 0x016D (LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH BREVE)
    
    
    - 0x02DD (DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT)
    
    
    - 0x02C7 (CARON)
    
    
    - 0x02D8 (BREVE)
    
    
    - 0x02DB (OGONEK)
    

    [code: missing-codepoints]

🔥 XanhMono-Regular.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    Missing required codepoints:

    - 0x02D9 (DOT ABOVE)
    
    
    - 0x016C (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH BREVE)
    
    
    - 0x0237 (LATIN SMALL LETTER DOTLESS J)
    
    
    - 0x016D (LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH BREVE)
    
    
    - 0x02DD (DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT)
    
    
    - 0x02C7 (CARON)
    
    
    - 0x02D8 (BREVE)
    
    
    - 0x02DB (OGONEK)
    

    [code: missing-codepoints]

Check for codepoints not covered by METADATA subsets.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/metadata/unreachable_subsetting>
⚠️ XanhMono-Italic.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    The following codepoints supported by the font are not covered by any subsets defined in the font's metadata file, and will never be served. You can solve this by either manually adding additional subset declarations to METADATA.pb, or by editing the glyphset definitions.

    • U+0302 COMBINING CIRCUMFLEX ACCENT: try adding one of: cherokee, tifinagh, coptic, math
    • U+0306 COMBINING BREVE: try adding one of: old-permic, tifinagh
    • U+0307 COMBINING DOT ABOVE: try adding one of: old-permic, math, canadian-aboriginal, malayalam, coptic, syriac, tai-le, tifinagh
    • U+030A COMBINING RING ABOVE: try adding syriac
    • U+030B COMBINING DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT: try adding one of: cherokee, osage
    • U+030C COMBINING CARON: try adding one of: cherokee, tai-le
    • U+0312 COMBINING TURNED COMMA ABOVE: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+031B COMBINING HORN: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+0326 COMBINING COMMA BELOW: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+0327 COMBINING CEDILLA: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+0328 COMBINING OGONEK: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2021 DOUBLE DAGGER: try adding adlam
    • U+2030 PER MILLE SIGN: try adding adlam
    • U+2070 SUPERSCRIPT ZERO: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2075 SUPERSCRIPT FIVE: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2076 SUPERSCRIPT SIX: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2077 SUPERSCRIPT SEVEN: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2078 SUPERSCRIPT EIGHT: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2079 SUPERSCRIPT NINE: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2080 SUBSCRIPT ZERO: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2081 SUBSCRIPT ONE: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2082 SUBSCRIPT TWO: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2083 SUBSCRIPT THREE: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2084 SUBSCRIPT FOUR: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2085 SUBSCRIPT FIVE: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2086 SUBSCRIPT SIX: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2087 SUBSCRIPT SEVEN: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2088 SUBSCRIPT EIGHT: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2089 SUBSCRIPT NINE: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+215B VULGAR FRACTION ONE EIGHTH: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+215C VULGAR FRACTION THREE EIGHTHS: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+215D VULGAR FRACTION FIVE EIGHTHS: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+215E VULGAR FRACTION SEVEN EIGHTHS: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2248 ALMOST EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2260 NOT EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2264 LESS-THAN OR EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2265 GREATER-THAN OR EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+25CA LOZENGE: try adding one of: math, symbols

    Or you can add the above codepoints to one of the subsets supported by the font: latin, latin-ext, menu, vietnamese [code: unreachable-subsetting]

⚠️ XanhMono-Regular.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    The following codepoints supported by the font are not covered by any subsets defined in the font's metadata file, and will never be served. You can solve this by either manually adding additional subset declarations to METADATA.pb, or by editing the glyphset definitions.

    • U+0302 COMBINING CIRCUMFLEX ACCENT: try adding one of: cherokee, tifinagh, coptic, math
    • U+0306 COMBINING BREVE: try adding one of: old-permic, tifinagh
    • U+0307 COMBINING DOT ABOVE: try adding one of: old-permic, math, canadian-aboriginal, malayalam, coptic, syriac, tai-le, tifinagh
    • U+030A COMBINING RING ABOVE: try adding syriac
    • U+030B COMBINING DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT: try adding one of: cherokee, osage
    • U+030C COMBINING CARON: try adding one of: cherokee, tai-le
    • U+0312 COMBINING TURNED COMMA ABOVE: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+031B COMBINING HORN: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+0326 COMBINING COMMA BELOW: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+0327 COMBINING CEDILLA: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+0328 COMBINING OGONEK: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2021 DOUBLE DAGGER: try adding adlam
    • U+2030 PER MILLE SIGN: try adding adlam
    • U+2070 SUPERSCRIPT ZERO: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2075 SUPERSCRIPT FIVE: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2076 SUPERSCRIPT SIX: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2077 SUPERSCRIPT SEVEN: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2078 SUPERSCRIPT EIGHT: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2079 SUPERSCRIPT NINE: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2080 SUBSCRIPT ZERO: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2081 SUBSCRIPT ONE: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2082 SUBSCRIPT TWO: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2083 SUBSCRIPT THREE: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2084 SUBSCRIPT FOUR: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2085 SUBSCRIPT FIVE: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2086 SUBSCRIPT SIX: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2087 SUBSCRIPT SEVEN: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2088 SUBSCRIPT EIGHT: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2089 SUBSCRIPT NINE: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+215B VULGAR FRACTION ONE EIGHTH: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+215C VULGAR FRACTION THREE EIGHTHS: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+215D VULGAR FRACTION FIVE EIGHTHS: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+215E VULGAR FRACTION SEVEN EIGHTHS: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2248 ALMOST EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2260 NOT EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2264 LESS-THAN OR EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+2265 GREATER-THAN OR EQUAL TO: try adding math
    • U+25CA LOZENGE: try adding one of: math, symbols

    Or you can add the above codepoints to one of the subsets supported by the font: latin, latin-ext, menu, vietnamese [code: unreachable-subsetting]

Font has old ttfautohint applied?

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/old_ttfautohint>
⚠️ XanhMono-Italic.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    ttfautohint used in font = 1.8.3; latest = 1.8.4; Need to re-run with the newer version! [code: old-ttfa]

⚠️ XanhMono-Regular.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    ttfautohint used in font = 1.8.3; latest = 1.8.4; Need to re-run with the newer version! [code: old-ttfa]

METADATA.pb: Check URL on copyright string is the same as in repository_url field.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/metadata/consistent_repo_urls>
🔥 XanhMono-Italic.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    Value of repository_url field is

    But font copyright string has: https://github.com/yellow-type-foundry/xanhmono and https://github.com/yellow-type-foundry/xanhmono [code: mismatch]

🔥 XanhMono-Regular.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    Value of repository_url field is

    But font copyright string has: https://github.com/yellow-type-foundry/xanhmono and https://github.com/yellow-type-foundry/xanhmono [code: mismatch]

Check glyphs do not have components which are themselves components.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/glyf_nested_components>
🔥 XanhMono-Italic.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    The following glyphs have components which themselves are component glyphs: * uni1EDA * uni1EE2 * uni1EDC * uni1EDE * uni1EE0 * dcaron * lcaron * uni1EDB * uni1EE3 * uni1EDD * uni1EDF * uni1EE1 * uni1EE9 * uni1EF1 * uni1EEB * uni1EED * uni1EEF * colon * quoteleft * quoteright and guillemotright [code: found-nested-components]

🔥 XanhMono-Regular.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    The following glyphs have components which themselves are component glyphs: * uni1EDA * uni1EE2 * uni1EDC * uni1EDE * uni1EE0 * dcaron * uni1ECB * lcaron * uni1EDB * uni1EE3 * uni1EDD * uni1EDF * uni1EE1 * uni1EE9 * uni1EF1 * uni1EEB * uni1EED * uni1EEF * colon * quoteleft * quoteright and guillemotright [code: found-nested-components]

A static fonts directory with at least two fonts must accompany variable fonts

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/repo/vf_has_static_fonts>
⚠️ XanhMono-Italic.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    Please consider adding a subdirectory called "static/" and including in it static font files. [code: missing]

⚠️ XanhMono-Regular.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    Please consider adding a subdirectory called "static/" and including in it static font files. [code: missing]

METADATA.pb: Designers are listed correctly on the Google Fonts catalog?

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/metadata/designer_profiles>
⚠️ XanhMono-Italic.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    It seems that Lâm Bảo is still not listed on the designers catalog. Please submit a photo and a link to a webpage where people can learn more about the work of this designer/typefoundry. [code: profile-not-found]

  • ⚠️ WARN

    It seems that Duy Dao is still not listed on the designers catalog. Please submit a photo and a link to a webpage where people can learn more about the work of this designer/typefoundry. [code: profile-not-found]

⚠️ XanhMono-Regular.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    It seems that Lâm Bảo is still not listed on the designers catalog. Please submit a photo and a link to a webpage where people can learn more about the work of this designer/typefoundry. [code: profile-not-found]

  • ⚠️ WARN

    It seems that Duy Dao is still not listed on the designers catalog. Please submit a photo and a link to a webpage where people can learn more about the work of this designer/typefoundry. [code: profile-not-found]

On a family update, the DESCRIPTION.en_us.html file should ideally also be updated.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/description/family_update>
⚠️ XanhMono-Italic.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    The DESCRIPTION.en_us.html file in this family has not changed in comparison to the latest font release on the google/fonts github repo. Please consider mentioning note-worthy improvements made to the family recently. [code: description-not-updated]

⚠️ XanhMono-Regular.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    The DESCRIPTION.en_us.html file in this family has not changed in comparison to the latest font release on the google/fonts github repo. Please consider mentioning note-worthy improvements made to the family recently. [code: description-not-updated]

Ensure fonts have ScriptLangTags declared on the 'meta' table.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/meta/script_lang_tags>
⚠️ XanhMono-Italic.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

⚠️ XanhMono-Regular.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

Section: Universal

🔥🔥🔥🔥⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️

Check font contains no unreachable glyphs

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/unreachable_glyphs>
⚠️ XanhMono-Italic.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

    - c.001
    
    - e.001
    

    [code: unreachable-glyphs]

⚠️ XanhMono-Regular.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

    - c.001
    
    - e.001
    

    [code: unreachable-glyphs]

Check if each glyph has the recommended amount of contours.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/contour_count>
⚠️ XanhMono-Italic.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

    The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

    - Glyph name: Q	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0
    
    - Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: eogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: ohorn	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: uhorn	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EB4	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 4
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EB5	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 4
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EDB	Contours detected: 4	Expected: 3
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EDD	Contours detected: 4	Expected: 3
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EDF	Contours detected: 4	Expected: 3
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EE1	Contours detected: 4	Expected: 3
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EE3	Contours detected: 4	Expected: 3
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EE9	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EEB	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EED	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EEF	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EF1	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: daggerdbl	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1 or 3
    
    - Glyph name: Q	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: daggerdbl	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1 or 3
    
    - Glyph name: eogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: ohorn	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: uhorn	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EB4	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 4
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EB5	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 4
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EDB	Contours detected: 4	Expected: 3
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EDD	Contours detected: 4	Expected: 3
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EDF	Contours detected: 4	Expected: 3
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EE1	Contours detected: 4	Expected: 3
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EE3	Contours detected: 4	Expected: 3
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EE9	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EEB	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EED	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EEF	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EF1	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    

    [code: contour-count]

⚠️ XanhMono-Regular.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

    The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

    - Glyph name: Q	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0
    
    - Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: eogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: ohorn	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: uhorn	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EDB	Contours detected: 4	Expected: 3
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EDD	Contours detected: 4	Expected: 3
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EDF	Contours detected: 4	Expected: 3
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EE1	Contours detected: 4	Expected: 3
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EE3	Contours detected: 4	Expected: 3
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EE9	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EEB	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EED	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EEF	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EF1	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: daggerdbl	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1 or 3
    
    - Glyph name: Q	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: daggerdbl	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1 or 3
    
    - Glyph name: eogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: ohorn	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: uhorn	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EDB	Contours detected: 4	Expected: 3
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EDD	Contours detected: 4	Expected: 3
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EDF	Contours detected: 4	Expected: 3
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EE1	Contours detected: 4	Expected: 3
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EE3	Contours detected: 4	Expected: 3
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EE9	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EEB	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EED	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EEF	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: uni1EF1	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    

    [code: contour-count]

Does the font contain a soft hyphen?

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/soft_hyphen>
⚠️ XanhMono-Italic.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

⚠️ XanhMono-Regular.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

Ensure component transforms do not perform scaling or rotation.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/transformed_components>
🔥 XanhMono-Italic.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    The following glyphs had components with scaling or rotation or inverted outline direction:

    • nine (component six)
    • bullet (component uni0307)
    • endash (component hyphen)
    • emdash (component hyphen)
    • underscore (component hyphen)
    • quotedblleft (component quotedblbase)
    • quoteleft (component quotesinglbase)
    • guillemotright (component guillemotleft)
    • multiply (component plus)
    • greater (component less) [code: transformed-components]
🔥 XanhMono-Regular.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    The following glyphs had components with scaling or rotation or inverted outline direction:

    • nine (component six)
    • bullet (component uni0307)
    • endash (component hyphen)
    • emdash (component hyphen)
    • underscore (component hyphen)
    • quotedblleft (component quotedblbase)
    • quoteleft (component quotesinglbase)
    • guillemotright (component guillemotleft)
    • multiply (component plus)
    • greater (component less) [code: transformed-components]

Check accent of Lcaron, dcaron, lcaron, tcaron (derived from com.google.fonts/check/alt_caron)

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/alt_caron:googlefonts>
🔥 XanhMono-Italic.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    Lcaron uses component uni030C. [code: wrong-mark]

🔥 XanhMono-Regular.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    Lcaron uses component uni030C. [code: wrong-mark]

Section: fontbakery.profiles.name

⚠️⚠️⏩⏩⏩

Checking correctness of monospaced metadata.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/monospace>
⚠️ XanhMono-Italic.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    The OpenType spec recomments at https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/opentype/spec/recom#hhea-table that hhea.numberOfHMetrics be set to 3 but this font has 492 instead. Please read https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/issues/3014 to decide whether this makes sense for your font. [code: bad-numberOfHMetrics]

⚠️ XanhMono-Regular.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    The OpenType spec recomments at https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/opentype/spec/recom#hhea-table that hhea.numberOfHMetrics be set to 3 but this font has 492 instead. Please read https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/issues/3014 to decide whether this makes sense for your font. [code: bad-numberOfHMetrics]

Section: fontbakery.profiles.dsig

⚠️⚠️

Does the font have a DSIG table?

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/dsig>
⚠️ XanhMono-Italic.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    This font has a digital signature (DSIG table) which is only required - even if only a placeholder - on old programs like MS Office 2013 in order to work properly. The current recommendation is to completely remove the DSIG table. [code: found-DSIG]

⚠️ XanhMono-Regular.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    This font has a digital signature (DSIG table) which is only required - even if only a placeholder - on old programs like MS Office 2013 in order to work properly. The current recommendation is to completely remove the DSIG table. [code: found-DSIG]

Section: Shaping Checks

⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩

Ensure dotted circle glyph is present and can attach marks.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/dotted_circle>
⚠️ XanhMono-Italic.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]

⚠️ XanhMono-Regular.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]

Ensure soft_dotted characters lose their dot when combined with marks that replace the dot.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/soft_dotted>
⚠️ XanhMono-Italic.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: j̀ j́ j̃ j̄ j̈ į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌ ị̀ ị́ ị̂ ị̃ ị̄

    The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: ĭ̦ i̦̇ i̦̊ i̦̋ ǐ̦ i̦̒ ĵ j̆ j̇ j̉ j̊ j̋ ǰ j̒ j̛̀ j̛́ ĵ̛ j̛̃ j̛̄ j̛̆

    Your font fully covers the following languages that require the soft-dotted feature: Ebira (Latn, 2,200,000 speakers).

    Your font does not cover the following languages that require the soft-dotted feature: Lugbara (Latn, 2,200,000 speakers), Lithuanian (Latn, 2,357,094 speakers), Ukrainian (Cyrl, 29,273,587 speakers), Kom (Latn, 360,685 speakers), Koonzime (Latn, 40,000 speakers), Navajo (Latn, 166,319 speakers), Dan (Latn, 1,099,244 speakers), Basaa (Latn, 332,940 speakers), Ma’di (Latn, 584,000 speakers), Nateni (Latn, 100,000 speakers), Belarusian (Cyrl, 10,064,517 speakers), Ejagham (Latn, 120,000 speakers), Igbo (Latn, 27,823,640 speakers), Avokaya (Latn, 100,000 speakers), Dutch (Latn, 31,709,104 speakers), Aghem (Latn, 38,843 speakers). [code: soft-dotted]

⚠️ XanhMono-Regular.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: j̀ j́ j̃ j̄ j̈ į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌ ị̀ ị́ ị̂ ị̃ ị̄

    The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: ĭ̦ i̦̇ i̦̊ i̦̋ ǐ̦ i̦̒ ĵ j̆ j̇ j̉ j̊ j̋ ǰ j̒ j̛̀ j̛́ ĵ̛ j̛̃ j̛̄ j̛̆

    Your font fully covers the following languages that require the soft-dotted feature: Ebira (Latn, 2,200,000 speakers).

    Your font does not cover the following languages that require the soft-dotted feature: Lugbara (Latn, 2,200,000 speakers), Lithuanian (Latn, 2,357,094 speakers), Ukrainian (Cyrl, 29,273,587 speakers), Kom (Latn, 360,685 speakers), Koonzime (Latn, 40,000 speakers), Navajo (Latn, 166,319 speakers), Dan (Latn, 1,099,244 speakers), Basaa (Latn, 332,940 speakers), Ma’di (Latn, 584,000 speakers), Nateni (Latn, 100,000 speakers), Belarusian (Cyrl, 10,064,517 speakers), Ejagham (Latn, 120,000 speakers), Igbo (Latn, 27,823,640 speakers), Avokaya (Latn, 100,000 speakers), Dutch (Latn, 31,709,104 speakers), Aghem (Latn, 38,843 speakers). [code: soft-dotted]