Fontbakery Technical Report

If you think a check is flawed or have an idea for a check, please file an issue at https://github.com/fonttools/fontbakery/issues and remember to include a pointer to the repo and branch you're checking.

Summary

💥 ERROR 🔥 FAIL ⚠️ WARN ⏩ SKIP ℹ️ INFO ✅ PASS
0 35 31 126 15 258
0% 9% 8% 33% 4% 68%

Note: The following loglevels were omitted in this report: SKIP, INFO, PASS, DEBUG

Meaning of check results:

If you get ERRORs, please help us improve the tool by reporting them at our issue tracker.

(but other kinds of bug reports and/or feature requests are also always welcome, of course!)

FontBakery version: 0.9.2

Section: Google Fonts

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️

Check Google Fonts glyph coverage.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/glyph_coverage>
🔥 Ranga-Regular.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    Missing required codepoints:

    - 0x0308 (COMBINING DIAERESIS)
    
    
    - 0x0300 (COMBINING GRAVE ACCENT)
    
    
    - 0x0301 (COMBINING ACUTE ACCENT)
    
    
    - 0x030B (COMBINING DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT)
    
    
    - 0x0304 (COMBINING MACRON)
    
    
    - 0x010A (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER C WITH DOT ABOVE)
    
    
    - 0x0120 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER G WITH DOT ABOVE)
    
    
    - 0x0126 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER H WITH STROKE)
    
    
    - 0x0132 (LATIN CAPITAL LIGATURE IJ)
    
    
    - 0x014A (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER ENG)
    
    
    - 0x1E9E (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER SHARP S)
    
    
    - 0x016C (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH BREVE)
    
    
    - 0x1E82 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER W WITH ACUTE)
    
    
    - 0x0174 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER W WITH CIRCUMFLEX)
    
    
    - 0x1E84 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER W WITH DIAERESIS)
    
    
    - 0x1E80 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER W WITH GRAVE)
    
    
    - 0x0176 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Y WITH CIRCUMFLEX)
    
    
    - 0x1EF2 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Y WITH GRAVE)
    
    
    - 0x010B (LATIN SMALL LETTER C WITH DOT ABOVE)
    
    
    - 0x0121 (LATIN SMALL LETTER G WITH DOT ABOVE)
    
    
    - 0x0127 (LATIN SMALL LETTER H WITH STROKE)
    
    
    - 0x0133 (LATIN SMALL LIGATURE IJ)
    
    
    - 0x0237 (LATIN SMALL LETTER DOTLESS J)
    
    
    - 0x014B (LATIN SMALL LETTER ENG)
    
    
    - 0x016D (LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH BREVE)
    
    
    - 0x1E83 (LATIN SMALL LETTER W WITH ACUTE)
    
    
    - 0x0175 (LATIN SMALL LETTER W WITH CIRCUMFLEX)
    
    
    - 0x1E85 (LATIN SMALL LETTER W WITH DIAERESIS)
    
    
    - 0x1E81 (LATIN SMALL LETTER W WITH GRAVE)
    
    
    - 0x0177 (LATIN SMALL LETTER Y WITH CIRCUMFLEX)
    
    
    - 0x1EF3 (LATIN SMALL LETTER Y WITH GRAVE)
    
    
    - 0x0307 (COMBINING DOT ABOVE)
    
    
    - 0x0302 (COMBINING CIRCUMFLEX ACCENT)
    
    
    - 0x030C (COMBINING CARON)
    
    
    - 0x0306 (COMBINING BREVE)
    
    
    - 0x030A (COMBINING RING ABOVE)
    
    
    - 0x0312 (COMBINING TURNED COMMA ABOVE)
    
    
    - 0x0326 (COMBINING COMMA BELOW)
    
    
    - 0x0327 (COMBINING CEDILLA)
    
    
    - 0x0328 (COMBINING OGONEK)
    

    [code: missing-codepoints]

🔥 Ranga-Bold.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    Missing required codepoints:

    - 0x0308 (COMBINING DIAERESIS)
    
    
    - 0x0300 (COMBINING GRAVE ACCENT)
    
    
    - 0x0301 (COMBINING ACUTE ACCENT)
    
    
    - 0x030B (COMBINING DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT)
    
    
    - 0x0304 (COMBINING MACRON)
    
    
    - 0x010A (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER C WITH DOT ABOVE)
    
    
    - 0x0120 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER G WITH DOT ABOVE)
    
    
    - 0x0126 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER H WITH STROKE)
    
    
    - 0x0132 (LATIN CAPITAL LIGATURE IJ)
    
    
    - 0x014A (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER ENG)
    
    
    - 0x1E9E (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER SHARP S)
    
    
    - 0x016C (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH BREVE)
    
    
    - 0x1E82 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER W WITH ACUTE)
    
    
    - 0x0174 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER W WITH CIRCUMFLEX)
    
    
    - 0x1E84 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER W WITH DIAERESIS)
    
    
    - 0x1E80 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER W WITH GRAVE)
    
    
    - 0x0176 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Y WITH CIRCUMFLEX)
    
    
    - 0x1EF2 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Y WITH GRAVE)
    
    
    - 0x010B (LATIN SMALL LETTER C WITH DOT ABOVE)
    
    
    - 0x0121 (LATIN SMALL LETTER G WITH DOT ABOVE)
    
    
    - 0x0127 (LATIN SMALL LETTER H WITH STROKE)
    
    
    - 0x0133 (LATIN SMALL LIGATURE IJ)
    
    
    - 0x0237 (LATIN SMALL LETTER DOTLESS J)
    
    
    - 0x014B (LATIN SMALL LETTER ENG)
    
    
    - 0x016D (LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH BREVE)
    
    
    - 0x1E83 (LATIN SMALL LETTER W WITH ACUTE)
    
    
    - 0x0175 (LATIN SMALL LETTER W WITH CIRCUMFLEX)
    
    
    - 0x1E85 (LATIN SMALL LETTER W WITH DIAERESIS)
    
    
    - 0x1E81 (LATIN SMALL LETTER W WITH GRAVE)
    
    
    - 0x0177 (LATIN SMALL LETTER Y WITH CIRCUMFLEX)
    
    
    - 0x1EF3 (LATIN SMALL LETTER Y WITH GRAVE)
    
    
    - 0x0307 (COMBINING DOT ABOVE)
    
    
    - 0x0302 (COMBINING CIRCUMFLEX ACCENT)
    
    
    - 0x030C (COMBINING CARON)
    
    
    - 0x0306 (COMBINING BREVE)
    
    
    - 0x030A (COMBINING RING ABOVE)
    
    
    - 0x0312 (COMBINING TURNED COMMA ABOVE)
    
    
    - 0x0326 (COMBINING COMMA BELOW)
    
    
    - 0x0327 (COMBINING CEDILLA)
    
    
    - 0x0328 (COMBINING OGONEK)
    

    [code: missing-codepoints]

Check for codepoints not covered by METADATA subsets.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/metadata/unreachable_subsetting>
⚠️ Ranga-Regular.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    The following codepoints supported by the font are not covered by any subsets defined in the font's metadata file, and will never be served. You can solve this by either manually adding additional subset declarations to METADATA.pb, or by editing the glyphset definitions.

    • U+000C : not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+02C7 CARON: try adding one of: canadian-aboriginal, tifinagh
    • U+02D8 BREVE: try adding canadian-aboriginal
    • U+02D9 DOT ABOVE: try adding canadian-aboriginal
    • U+02DB OGONEK: try adding canadian-aboriginal
    • U+02DD DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+0303 COMBINING TILDE: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2021 DOUBLE DAGGER: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2030 PER MILLE SIGN: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2082 SUBSCRIPT TWO: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2084 SUBSCRIPT FOUR: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+FFEA HALFWIDTH UPWARDS ARROW: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+FFEB HALFWIDTH RIGHTWARDS ARROW: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+FFEC HALFWIDTH DOWNWARDS ARROW: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+FFED HALFWIDTH BLACK SQUARE: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+FFEE HALFWIDTH WHITE CIRCLE: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+FFEF : not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+FFF0 : not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+FFF1 : not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+FFF2 : not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+FFF3 : not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+FFF4 : not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+FFF5 : not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+FFF6 : not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+FFF7 : not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+FFF8 : not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+FFFB INTERLINEAR ANNOTATION TERMINATOR: not included in any glyphset definition

    Or you can add the above codepoints to one of the subsets supported by the font: devanagari, latin, latin-ext, menu [code: unreachable-subsetting]

⚠️ Ranga-Bold.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    The following codepoints supported by the font are not covered by any subsets defined in the font's metadata file, and will never be served. You can solve this by either manually adding additional subset declarations to METADATA.pb, or by editing the glyphset definitions.

    • U+000C : not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+02C7 CARON: try adding one of: canadian-aboriginal, tifinagh
    • U+02D8 BREVE: try adding canadian-aboriginal
    • U+02D9 DOT ABOVE: try adding canadian-aboriginal
    • U+02DB OGONEK: try adding canadian-aboriginal
    • U+02DD DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+0303 COMBINING TILDE: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2021 DOUBLE DAGGER: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2030 PER MILLE SIGN: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2082 SUBSCRIPT TWO: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+2084 SUBSCRIPT FOUR: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+FFEA HALFWIDTH UPWARDS ARROW: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+FFEB HALFWIDTH RIGHTWARDS ARROW: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+FFEC HALFWIDTH DOWNWARDS ARROW: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+FFED HALFWIDTH BLACK SQUARE: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+FFEE HALFWIDTH WHITE CIRCLE: not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+FFEF : not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+FFF0 : not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+FFF1 : not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+FFF2 : not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+FFF3 : not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+FFF4 : not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+FFF5 : not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+FFF6 : not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+FFF7 : not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+FFF8 : not included in any glyphset definition
    • U+FFFB INTERLINEAR ANNOTATION TERMINATOR: not included in any glyphset definition

    Or you can add the above codepoints to one of the subsets supported by the font: devanagari, latin, latin-ext, menu [code: unreachable-subsetting]

Check license file has good copyright string.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/license/OFL_copyright>
🔥 Ranga-Regular.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    First line in license file is:

    "copyright (c) 2014 by tiptoptyp"

    which does not match the expected format, similar to:

    "Copyright 2022 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" [code: bad-format]

🔥 Ranga-Bold.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    First line in license file is:

    "copyright (c) 2014 by tiptoptyp"

    which does not match the expected format, similar to:

    "Copyright 2022 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" [code: bad-format]

Check copyright namerecords match license file.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/name/license>
🔥 Ranga-Regular.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    Font lacks NameID 13 (LICENSE DESCRIPTION). A proper licensing entry must be set. [code: missing]

🔥 Ranga-Bold.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    Font lacks NameID 13 (LICENSE DESCRIPTION). A proper licensing entry must be set. [code: missing]

Is the Grid-fitting and Scan-conversion Procedure ('gasp') table set to optimize rendering?

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/gasp>
⚠️ Ranga-Regular.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    The gasp range 0xFFFF value 0x02 should be set to 0x0F. [code: unset-flags]

⚠️ Ranga-Bold.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    The gasp range 0xFFFF value 0x02 should be set to 0x0F. [code: unset-flags]

Copyright notices match canonical pattern in METADATA.pb

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/metadata/valid_copyright>
🔥 Ranga-Regular.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    METADATA.pb: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2020 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "copyright (c) 2014 by tiptoptyp." [code: bad-notice-format]

🔥 Ranga-Bold.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    METADATA.pb: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2020 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "copyright (c) 2014 by tiptoptyp." [code: bad-notice-format]

Copyright notices match canonical pattern in fonts

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/font_copyright>
🔥 Ranga-Regular.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright (c) 2014 by TipTopTyp. All rights reserved under SIL openfont License 1.1" [code: bad-notice-format]

  • 🔥 FAIL

    Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright (c) 2014 by TipTopTyp. All rights reserved under SIL openfont License 1.1" [code: bad-notice-format]

🔥 Ranga-Bold.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright (c) 2014 by TipTopTyp. All rights reserved under SIL openfont License 1.1" [code: bad-notice-format]

  • 🔥 FAIL

    Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: "Copyright 2019 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)" But instead we have got: "Copyright (c) 2014 by TipTopTyp. All rights reserved under SIL openfont License 1.1" [code: bad-notice-format]

Stricter unitsPerEm criteria for Google Fonts.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/unitsperem_strict>
⚠️ Ranga-Regular.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    Font em size (unitsPerEm) is 2218 which may be too large (causing filesize bloat), unless you are sure that the detail level in this font requires that much precision. [code: large-value]

⚠️ Ranga-Bold.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    Font em size (unitsPerEm) is 2218 which may be too large (causing filesize bloat), unless you are sure that the detail level in this font requires that much precision. [code: large-value]

Copyright field for this font on METADATA.pb matches all copyright notice entries on the name table ?

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/metadata/nameid/copyright>
🔥 Ranga-Regular.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    Copyright field for this font on METADATA.pb ("Copyright (c) 2014 by TipTopTyp.") differs from a copyright notice entry on the name table: "Copyright (c) 2014 by TipTopTyp. All rights reserved under SIL openfont License 1.1" [code: mismatch]

  • 🔥 FAIL

    Copyright field for this font on METADATA.pb ("Copyright (c) 2014 by TipTopTyp.") differs from a copyright notice entry on the name table: "Copyright (c) 2014 by TipTopTyp. All rights reserved under SIL openfont License 1.1" [code: mismatch]

🔥 Ranga-Bold.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    Copyright field for this font on METADATA.pb ("Copyright (c) 2014 by TipTopTyp.") differs from a copyright notice entry on the name table: "Copyright (c) 2014 by TipTopTyp. All rights reserved under SIL openfont License 1.1" [code: mismatch]

  • 🔥 FAIL

    Copyright field for this font on METADATA.pb ("Copyright (c) 2014 by TipTopTyp.") differs from a copyright notice entry on the name table: "Copyright (c) 2014 by TipTopTyp. All rights reserved under SIL openfont License 1.1" [code: mismatch]

Font enables smart dropout control in "prep" table instructions?

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/smart_dropout>
🔥 Ranga-Regular.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    The 'prep' table does not contain TrueType instructions enabling smart dropout control. To fix, export the font with autohinting enabled, or run ttfautohint on the font, or run the gftools fix-nonhinting script. [code: lacks-smart-dropout]

🔥 Ranga-Bold.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    The 'prep' table does not contain TrueType instructions enabling smart dropout control. To fix, export the font with autohinting enabled, or run ttfautohint on the font, or run the gftools fix-nonhinting script. [code: lacks-smart-dropout]

Are there unwanted Apple tables?

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/aat>
🔥 Ranga-Regular.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    Unwanted AAT tables were found in the font and should be removed, either by fonttools/ttx or by editing them using the tool they built with:

    • prop [code: has-unwanted-tables]
🔥 Ranga-Bold.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    Unwanted AAT tables were found in the font and should be removed, either by fonttools/ttx or by editing them using the tool they built with:

    • prop [code: has-unwanted-tables]

A static fonts directory with at least two fonts must accompany variable fonts

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/repo/vf_has_static_fonts>
⚠️ Ranga-Regular.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    Please consider adding a subdirectory called "static/" and including in it static font files. [code: missing]

⚠️ Ranga-Bold.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    Please consider adding a subdirectory called "static/" and including in it static font files. [code: missing]

METADATA.pb: Designers are listed correctly on the Google Fonts catalog?

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/metadata/designer_profiles>
⚠️ Ranga-Regular.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    It seems that TipTopTyp is still not listed on the designers catalog. Please submit a photo and a link to a webpage where people can learn more about the work of this designer/typefoundry. [code: profile-not-found]

⚠️ Ranga-Bold.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    It seems that TipTopTyp is still not listed on the designers catalog. Please submit a photo and a link to a webpage where people can learn more about the work of this designer/typefoundry. [code: profile-not-found]

On a family update, the DESCRIPTION.en_us.html file should ideally also be updated.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/description/family_update>
⚠️ Ranga-Regular.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    The DESCRIPTION.en_us.html file in this family has not changed in comparison to the latest font release on the google/fonts github repo. Please consider mentioning note-worthy improvements made to the family recently. [code: description-not-updated]

⚠️ Ranga-Bold.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    The DESCRIPTION.en_us.html file in this family has not changed in comparison to the latest font release on the google/fonts github repo. Please consider mentioning note-worthy improvements made to the family recently. [code: description-not-updated]

OS/2.fsSelection bit 7 (USE_TYPO_METRICS) is set in all fonts.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/os2/use_typo_metrics>
🔥 Ranga-Regular.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    OS/2.fsSelection bit 7 (USE_TYPO_METRICS) wasNOT set in the following fonts: ['/Users/simon/others-repos/fonts/ofl/ranga/Ranga-Regular.ttf', '/Users/simon/others-repos/fonts/ofl/ranga/Ranga-Bold.ttf']. [code: missing-os2-fsselection-bit7]

🔥 Ranga-Bold.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    OS/2.fsSelection bit 7 (USE_TYPO_METRICS) wasNOT set in the following fonts: ['/Users/simon/others-repos/fonts/ofl/ranga/Ranga-Regular.ttf', '/Users/simon/others-repos/fonts/ofl/ranga/Ranga-Bold.ttf']. [code: missing-os2-fsselection-bit7]

Ensure fonts have ScriptLangTags declared on the 'meta' table.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/meta/script_lang_tags>
⚠️ Ranga-Regular.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

⚠️ Ranga-Bold.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

Ensure fonts do not contain any pre-production tables.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/no_debugging_tables>
⚠️ Ranga-Regular.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    This font file contains the following pre-production tables: FFTM [code: has-debugging-tables]

⚠️ Ranga-Bold.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    This font file contains the following pre-production tables: FFTM [code: has-debugging-tables]

Section: Universal

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️

Checking OS/2 usWinAscent & usWinDescent.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/family/win_ascent_and_descent>
🔥 Ranga-Regular.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    OS/2.usWinDescent value should be equal or greater than 1028, but got 1027 instead [code: descent]

🔥 Ranga-Bold.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    OS/2.usWinDescent value should be equal or greater than 1028, but got 1027 instead [code: descent]

Font has **proper** whitespace glyph names?

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/whitespace_glyphnames>
⚠️ Ranga-Regular.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    Glyph 0x00A0 is called "nbspace": Change to "uni00A0" [code: not-recommended-00a0]

⚠️ Ranga-Bold.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    Glyph 0x00A0 is called "nbspace": Change to "uni00A0" [code: not-recommended-00a0]

Whitespace glyphs have ink?

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/whitespace_ink>
🔥 Ranga-Regular.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    Glyph 'zerowidthjoiner' has ink. It needs to be replaced by an empty glyph. [code: has-ink]

🔥 Ranga-Bold.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    Glyph 'zerowidthjoiner' has ink. It needs to be replaced by an empty glyph. [code: has-ink]

Are there unwanted tables?

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/unwanted_tables>
🔥 Ranga-Regular.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    The following unwanted font tables were found:

    • FFTM - Table contains redundant FontForge timestamp info
    • prop - Table used on AAT, Apple's OS X specific technology. Although Harfbuzz now has optional AAT support, new fonts should not be using that.

    They can be removed with the 'fix-unwanted-tables' script provided by gftools. [code: unwanted-tables]

🔥 Ranga-Bold.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    The following unwanted font tables were found:

    • FFTM - Table contains redundant FontForge timestamp info
    • prop - Table used on AAT, Apple's OS X specific technology. Although Harfbuzz now has optional AAT support, new fonts should not be using that.

    They can be removed with the 'fix-unwanted-tables' script provided by gftools. [code: unwanted-tables]

Check font contains no unreachable glyphs

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/unreachable_glyphs>
⚠️ Ranga-Regular.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

    - Euro.001
    
    - Gastick
    
    - Imacron
    
    - Nastick
    
    - Nastick45
    
    - SiroCopy
    
    - _0242
    
    - adevaComp
    
    - crankpipe
    
    - fromKahalf
    
    - guillemot
    
    - heartSa
    
    - klein.kreis
    
    - l_space_l
    
    - lowTha
    
    - nep_jha_virama
    
    - nga_virama_ka_viramadeva
    
    - nonmarkingreturn
    
    - phadeva_radeva_nuktadeva
    
    - r.alt1
    
    - r.alt2
    
    - r.alt3
    
    - smallDa
    
    - topHa
    
    - torupl
    
    - trademark.001
    
    - u.alt2
    
    - x.001
    
    - x.alt1
    
    - y.alt1
    
    - zhadeva.np
    

    [code: unreachable-glyphs]

⚠️ Ranga-Bold.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

    - Euro.001
    
    - Gastick
    
    - Imacron
    
    - Nastick
    
    - Nastick45
    
    - SiroCopy
    
    - _0242
    
    - adevaComp
    
    - crankpipe
    
    - fromKahalf
    
    - guillemot
    
    - heartSa
    
    - klein.kreis
    
    - l_space_l
    
    - lowTha
    
    - nep_jha_virama
    
    - nga_virama_ka_viramadeva
    
    - nonmarkingreturn
    
    - phadeva_radeva_nuktadeva
    
    - r.alt1
    
    - r.alt2
    
    - r.alt3
    
    - smallDa
    
    - topHa
    
    - torupl
    
    - trademark.001
    
    - u.alt2
    
    - x.001
    
    - x.alt1
    
    - y.alt1
    
    - zhadeva.np
    

    [code: unreachable-glyphs]

Check if each glyph has the recommended amount of contours.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/contour_count>
⚠️ Ranga-Regular.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

    The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

    - Glyph name: yen	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 1 or 2
    
    - Glyph name: Eth	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: dcroat	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: oe	Contours detected: 4	Expected: 3
    
    - Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: eshortdeva	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: aideva	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: cadeva	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: chadeva	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: jadeva	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: nyadeva	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: nnadeva	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: tadeva	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: thadeva	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: dhadeva	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: nnnadeva	Contours detected: 4	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: bhadeva	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: ladeva	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: shadeva	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: ooesigndeva	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: oshortsigndeva	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: osigndeva	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: ausigndeva	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: awsigndeva	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: omdeva	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 3
    
    - Glyph name: zadeva	Contours detected: 4	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: onedeva	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: zhadeva	Contours detected: 6	Expected: 4
    
    - Glyph name: zerowidthjoiner	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0
    
    - Glyph name: Eth	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: dcroat	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: oe	Contours detected: 4	Expected: 3
    
    - Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: yen	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 1 or 2
    

    [code: contour-count]

⚠️ Ranga-Bold.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

    The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

    - Glyph name: x	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: yen	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 1 or 2
    
    - Glyph name: Eth	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: dcroat	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: oe	Contours detected: 4	Expected: 3
    
    - Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: eshortdeva	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: aideva	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: cadeva	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: chadeva	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: jadeva	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: nyadeva	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: nnadeva	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: tadeva	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: thadeva	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: dhadeva	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: nnnadeva	Contours detected: 4	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: bhadeva	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: ladeva	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: shadeva	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: ooesigndeva	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: oshortsigndeva	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: osigndeva	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: ausigndeva	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: awsigndeva	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: omdeva	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 3
    
    - Glyph name: zadeva	Contours detected: 4	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: onedeva	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: zhadeva	Contours detected: 6	Expected: 4
    
    - Glyph name: zerowidthjoiner	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0
    
    - Glyph name: Eth	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: dcroat	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2
    
    - Glyph name: oe	Contours detected: 4	Expected: 3
    
    - Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: x	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1
    
    - Glyph name: yen	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 1 or 2
    

    [code: contour-count]

Check math signs have the same width.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/math_signs_width>
⚠️ Ranga-Regular.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    The most common width is 968 among a set of 2 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though:

    Width = 827: plus

    Width = 921: equal

    Width = 1720: logicalnot

    Width = 972: plusminus

    Width = 874: multiply

    Width = 980: divide

    Width = 866: minus [code: width-outliers]

⚠️ Ranga-Bold.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    The most common width is 1028 among a set of 2 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though:

    Width = 966: plus

    Width = 1019: equal

    Width = 1847: logicalnot

    Width = 1062: plusminus

    Width = 956: multiply

    Width = 1064: divide

    Width = 1005: minus [code: width-outliers]

Check accent of Lcaron, dcaron, lcaron, tcaron (derived from com.google.fonts/check/alt_caron)

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/alt_caron:googlefonts>
🔥 Ranga-Regular.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    dcaron uses component comma. [code: bad-mark]

  • 🔥 FAIL

    Lcaron uses component comma. [code: bad-mark]

  • 🔥 FAIL

    lcaron uses component comma. [code: bad-mark]

  • 🔥 FAIL

    tcaron uses component comma. [code: bad-mark]

🔥 Ranga-Bold.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    dcaron uses component comma. [code: bad-mark]

  • 🔥 FAIL

    Lcaron uses component comma. [code: bad-mark]

  • 🔥 FAIL

    lcaron uses component comma. [code: bad-mark]

  • 🔥 FAIL

    tcaron uses component comma. [code: bad-mark]

Section: fontbakery.profiles.head

🔥🔥⏩⏩

Checking font version fields (head and name table).

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/font_version>
🔥 Ranga-Regular.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    head version is "1.00101" while name version string (for platform 1, encoding 0) is "Version 1.0.2". [code: mismatch]

  • 🔥 FAIL

    head version is "1.00101" while name version string (for platform 3, encoding 1) is "Version 1.0.2". [code: mismatch]

🔥 Ranga-Bold.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    head version is "1.00101" while name version string (for platform 1, encoding 0) is "Version 1.0.2". [code: mismatch]

  • 🔥 FAIL

    head version is "1.00101" while name version string (for platform 3, encoding 1) is "Version 1.0.2". [code: mismatch]

Section: fontbakery.profiles.os2

⚠️⚠️⏩⏩

Check if OS/2 xAvgCharWidth is correct.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/xavgcharwidth>
⚠️ Ranga-Regular.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    OS/2 xAvgCharWidth is 863 but it should be 919 which corresponds to the average of the widths of all glyphs in the font. [code: xAvgCharWidth-wrong]

⚠️ Ranga-Bold.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    OS/2 xAvgCharWidth is 961 but it should be 1056 which corresponds to the average of the widths of all glyphs in the font. [code: xAvgCharWidth-wrong]

Section: fontbakery.profiles.post

🔥

Fonts have consistent underline thickness?

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/family/underline_thickness>
🔥 Family check
  • 🔥 FAIL

    Thickness of the underline is not the same across this family. In order to fix this, please make sure that the underlineThickness value is the same in the 'post' table of all of this family font files. Detected underlineThickness values are: /Users/simon/others-repos/fonts/ofl/ranga/Ranga-Regular.ttf: 30 /Users/simon/others-repos/fonts/ofl/ranga/Ranga-Bold.ttf: 60 [code: inconsistent-underline-thickness]

Section: fontbakery.profiles.hhea

🔥🔥

Check hhea.caretSlopeRise and hhea.caretSlopeRun

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/caret_slope>
🔥 Ranga-Regular.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    hhea.caretSlopeRise and hhea.caretSlopeRun do not match with post.italicAngle. Got: caretSlopeRise 100 and caretSlopeRun -25 Expected: caretSlopeRise 1 and caretSlopeRun 0 [code: caretslope-mismatch]

🔥 Ranga-Bold.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    hhea.caretSlopeRise and hhea.caretSlopeRun do not match with post.italicAngle. Got: caretSlopeRise 100 and caretSlopeRun -25 Expected: caretSlopeRise 1 and caretSlopeRun 0 [code: caretslope-mismatch]

Section: fontbakery.profiles.gdef

⚠️⚠️⚠️

Check glyphs in mark glyph class are non-spacing.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/gdef_spacing_marks>
⚠️ Ranga-Bold.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    The following spacing glyphs may be in the GDEF mark glyph class by mistake: rrvocalicsigndeva (U+0944) [code: spacing-mark-glyphs]

Check mark characters are in GDEF mark glyph class.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/gdef_mark_chars>
⚠️ Ranga-Regular.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    The following mark characters could be in the GDEF mark glyph class: anudattadeva (U+0952), fivecombiningdigitdeva (U+A8E5), nuktadeva (U+093C) and tildecomb (U+0303) [code: mark-chars]

⚠️ Ranga-Bold.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    The following mark characters could be in the GDEF mark glyph class: anudattadeva (U+0952), fivecombiningdigitdeva (U+A8E5), nuktadeva (U+093C) and tildecomb (U+0303) [code: mark-chars]

Section: fontbakery.profiles.kern

🔥🔥

Is there a usable "kern" table declared in the font?

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/kern_table>
🔥 Ranga-Regular.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    The following glyphs should not be used in the "kern" table because they are not in the "cmap" table: r.alt1, r.alt2, r.alt3, y.alt1 [code: kern-non-character-glyphs]

🔥 Ranga-Bold.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    The following glyphs should not be used in the "kern" table because they are not in the "cmap" table: r.alt1, r.alt2, r.alt3, y.alt1 [code: kern-non-character-glyphs]

Section: Shaping Checks

🔥🔥⚠️⚠️⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩

Ensure dotted circle glyph is present and can attach marks.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/dotted_circle>
🔥 Ranga-Regular.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    The following glyphs could not be attached to the dotted circle glyph:

    - acombiningletterdeva
    
    - acutedeva
    
    - aisigndeva
    
    - anusvaradeva
    
    - avagrahacombiningsigndeva
    
    - candrabindudeva
    
    - candrabinduinverteddeva
    
    - ecandralongsigndeva
    
    - ecandrasigndeva
    
    - eightcombiningdigitdeva
    
    - eshortsigndeva
    
    - esigndeva
    
    - fourcombiningdigitdeva
    
    - gravedeva
    
    - kacombiningletterdeva
    
    - llvocalicsigndeva
    
    - lvocalicsigndeva
    
    - nacombiningletterdeva
    
    - ninecombiningdigitdeva
    
    - oesigndeva
    
    - onecombiningdigitdeva
    
    - pacombiningletterdeva
    
    - racombiningletterdeva
    
    - rrvocalicsigndeva
    
    - rvocalicsigndeva
    
    - sevencombiningdigitdeva
    
    - sixcombiningdigitdeva
    
    - threecombiningdigitdeva
    
    - twocombiningdigitdeva
    
    - ucombiningletterdeva
    
    - udattadeva
    
    - uesigndeva
    
    - usigndeva
    
    - uuesigndeva
    
    - uusigndeva
    
    - vicombiningletterdeva
    
    - viramadeva
    
    - zerocombiningdigitdeva [code: unattached-dotted-circle-marks]
    
🔥 Ranga-Bold.ttf
  • 🔥 FAIL

    The following glyphs could not be attached to the dotted circle glyph:

    - acombiningletterdeva
    
    - acutedeva
    
    - aisigndeva
    
    - anusvaradeva
    
    - avagrahacombiningsigndeva
    
    - candrabindudeva
    
    - candrabinduinverteddeva
    
    - ecandralongsigndeva
    
    - ecandrasigndeva
    
    - eightcombiningdigitdeva
    
    - eshortsigndeva
    
    - esigndeva
    
    - fourcombiningdigitdeva
    
    - gravedeva
    
    - kacombiningletterdeva
    
    - llvocalicsigndeva
    
    - lvocalicsigndeva
    
    - nacombiningletterdeva
    
    - ninecombiningdigitdeva
    
    - oesigndeva
    
    - onecombiningdigitdeva
    
    - pacombiningletterdeva
    
    - racombiningletterdeva
    
    - rvocalicsigndeva
    
    - sevencombiningdigitdeva
    
    - sixcombiningdigitdeva
    
    - threecombiningdigitdeva
    
    - twocombiningdigitdeva
    
    - ucombiningletterdeva
    
    - udattadeva
    
    - uesigndeva
    
    - usigndeva
    
    - uuesigndeva
    
    - uusigndeva
    
    - vicombiningletterdeva
    
    - viramadeva
    
    - zerocombiningdigitdeva [code: unattached-dotted-circle-marks]
    

Ensure soft_dotted characters lose their dot when combined with marks that replace the dot.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/soft_dotted>
⚠️ Ranga-Regular.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: j̃ į̃

    The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: ĩ

    Your font does not cover the following languages that require the soft-dotted feature: Lithuanian (Latn, 2,357,094 speakers), Igbo (Latn, 27,823,640 speakers), Ukrainian (Cyrl, 29,273,587 speakers), Belarusian (Cyrl, 10,064,517 speakers), Dutch (Latn, 31,709,104 speakers), Aghem (Latn, 38,843 speakers), Navajo (Latn, 166,319 speakers), Basaa (Latn, 332,940 speakers). [code: soft-dotted]

⚠️ Ranga-Bold.ttf
  • ⚠️ WARN

    The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: j̃ į̃

    The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: ĩ

    Your font does not cover the following languages that require the soft-dotted feature: Navajo (Latn, 166,319 speakers), Aghem (Latn, 38,843 speakers), Igbo (Latn, 27,823,640 speakers), Lithuanian (Latn, 2,357,094 speakers), Basaa (Latn, 332,940 speakers), Belarusian (Cyrl, 10,064,517 speakers), Dutch (Latn, 31,709,104 speakers), Ukrainian (Cyrl, 29,273,587 speakers). [code: soft-dotted]