If you think a check is flawed or have an idea for a check, please file an issue at https://github.com/fonttools/fontbakery/issues and remember to include a pointer to the repo and branch you're checking.
Summary
💥 ERROR | 🔥 FAIL | ⚠️ WARN | ⏩ SKIP | ℹ️ INFO | ✅ PASS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 11 | 35 | 119 | 15 | 285 |
0% | 3% | 10% | 34% | 4% | 81% |
Note: The following loglevels were omitted in this report: SKIP, INFO, PASS, DEBUG
Meaning of check results:
- 💥 An ERROR is something wrong with FontBakery itself, possibly a bug.
- 🔥 A FAIL is a problem with the font that must be fixed.
- ⚠️ A WARN is something that you should consider addressing.
- ℹ️ An INFO result simply prints something useful. Typically stats.
- ✅ A PASS means the font looks good for the given checking routine.
- ⏩ And a SKIP happens when the check does not apply to the given font.
If you get ERRORs, please help us improve the tool by reporting them at our issue tracker.
(but other kinds of bug reports and/or feature requests are also always welcome, of course!)
FontBakery version: 0.9.2
Section: Google Fonts
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️Does font file include unacceptable control character glyphs?
🔥 Family check
- 🔥 FAIL
The following unacceptable control characters were identified: /Users/simon/others-repos/fonts/ofl/radley/Radley-Italic.ttf: uni0001, uni0002, uni0003, uni0004, uni0005, uni0006, uni0007, uni0008, uni0009, uni0010, uni0011, uni0012, uni0013, uni0014, uni0015, uni0016, uni0017, uni0018, uni0019 [code: unacceptable]
Checking OS/2 achVendID.
⚠️ Radley-Italic.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
OS/2 VendorID value 'newt' is not yet recognized. If you registered it recently, then it's safe to ignore this warning message. Otherwise, you should set it to your own unique 4 character code, and register it with Microsoft at https://www.microsoft.com/typography/links/vendorlist.aspx [code: unknown]
⚠️ Radley-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
OS/2 VendorID value 'newt' is not yet recognized. If you registered it recently, then it's safe to ignore this warning message. Otherwise, you should set it to your own unique 4 character code, and register it with Microsoft at https://www.microsoft.com/typography/links/vendorlist.aspx [code: unknown]
Check Google Fonts glyph coverage.
🔥 Radley-Italic.ttf
- 🔥 FAIL
Missing required codepoints:
- 0x0308 (COMBINING DIAERESIS) - 0x0300 (COMBINING GRAVE ACCENT) - 0x0301 (COMBINING ACUTE ACCENT) - 0x030B (COMBINING DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT) - 0x0304 (COMBINING MACRON) - 0x010A (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER C WITH DOT ABOVE) - 0x0116 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH DOT ABOVE) - 0x011E (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER G WITH BREVE) - 0x0120 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER G WITH DOT ABOVE) - 0x0126 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER H WITH STROKE) - 0x0130 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH DOT ABOVE) - 0x0136 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER K WITH CEDILLA) - 0x013B (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER L WITH CEDILLA) - 0x0145 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER N WITH CEDILLA) - 0x014A (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER ENG) - 0x014C (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH MACRON) - 0x1E9E (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER SHARP S) - 0x016C (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH BREVE) - 0x1E82 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER W WITH ACUTE) - 0x0174 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER W WITH CIRCUMFLEX) - 0x1E84 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER W WITH DIAERESIS) - 0x1E80 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER W WITH GRAVE) - 0x0176 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Y WITH CIRCUMFLEX) - 0x1EF2 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Y WITH GRAVE) - 0x010B (LATIN SMALL LETTER C WITH DOT ABOVE) - 0x0117 (LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH DOT ABOVE) - 0x011F (LATIN SMALL LETTER G WITH BREVE) - 0x0121 (LATIN SMALL LETTER G WITH DOT ABOVE) - 0x013C (LATIN SMALL LETTER L WITH CEDILLA) - 0x0146 (LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH CEDILLA) - 0x014B (LATIN SMALL LETTER ENG) - 0x014D (LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH MACRON) - 0x016D (LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH BREVE) - 0x1E83 (LATIN SMALL LETTER W WITH ACUTE) - 0x0175 (LATIN SMALL LETTER W WITH CIRCUMFLEX) - 0x1E85 (LATIN SMALL LETTER W WITH DIAERESIS) - 0x1E81 (LATIN SMALL LETTER W WITH GRAVE) - 0x0177 (LATIN SMALL LETTER Y WITH CIRCUMFLEX) - 0x1EF3 (LATIN SMALL LETTER Y WITH GRAVE) - 0x0302 (COMBINING CIRCUMFLEX ACCENT) - 0x030C (COMBINING CARON) - 0x0306 (COMBINING BREVE) - 0x030A (COMBINING RING ABOVE) - 0x0303 (COMBINING TILDE) - 0x0312 (COMBINING TURNED COMMA ABOVE) - 0x0327 (COMBINING CEDILLA) - 0x0328 (COMBINING OGONEK)
[code: missing-codepoints]
🔥 Radley-Regular.ttf
- 🔥 FAIL
Missing required codepoints:
- 0x0308 (COMBINING DIAERESIS) - 0x0300 (COMBINING GRAVE ACCENT) - 0x0301 (COMBINING ACUTE ACCENT) - 0x030B (COMBINING DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT) - 0x0304 (COMBINING MACRON) - 0x0116 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH DOT ABOVE) - 0x0130 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH DOT ABOVE) - 0x1E9E (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER SHARP S) - 0x1E82 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER W WITH ACUTE) - 0x0174 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER W WITH CIRCUMFLEX) - 0x1E84 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER W WITH DIAERESIS) - 0x1E80 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER W WITH GRAVE) - 0x0176 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Y WITH CIRCUMFLEX) - 0x1EF2 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Y WITH GRAVE) - 0x0111 (LATIN SMALL LETTER D WITH STROKE) - 0x0117 (LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH DOT ABOVE) - 0x1E83 (LATIN SMALL LETTER W WITH ACUTE) - 0x0175 (LATIN SMALL LETTER W WITH CIRCUMFLEX) - 0x1E85 (LATIN SMALL LETTER W WITH DIAERESIS) - 0x1E81 (LATIN SMALL LETTER W WITH GRAVE) - 0x0177 (LATIN SMALL LETTER Y WITH CIRCUMFLEX) - 0x1EF3 (LATIN SMALL LETTER Y WITH GRAVE) - 0x0302 (COMBINING CIRCUMFLEX ACCENT) - 0x030C (COMBINING CARON) - 0x0306 (COMBINING BREVE) - 0x030A (COMBINING RING ABOVE) - 0x0303 (COMBINING TILDE) - 0x0312 (COMBINING TURNED COMMA ABOVE) - 0x0327 (COMBINING CEDILLA) - 0x0328 (COMBINING OGONEK)
[code: missing-codepoints]
Check for codepoints not covered by METADATA subsets.
⚠️ Radley-Italic.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
The following codepoints supported by the font are not covered by any subsets defined in the font's metadata file, and will never be served. You can solve this by either manually adding additional subset declarations to METADATA.pb, or by editing the glyphset definitions.
- U+0001 : not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0002 : not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0003 : not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0004 : not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0005 : not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0006 : not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0007 : not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0008 : not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0009 : not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0010 : not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0011 : not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0012 : not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0013 : not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0014 : not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0015 : not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0016 : not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0017 : not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0018 : not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0019 : not included in any glyphset definition
- U+02C7 CARON: try adding one of: canadian-aboriginal, tifinagh
- U+02D8 BREVE: try adding canadian-aboriginal
- U+02D9 DOT ABOVE: try adding canadian-aboriginal
- U+02DB OGONEK: try adding canadian-aboriginal
- U+02DD DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0307 COMBINING DOT ABOVE: try adding one of: coptic, tai-le, malayalam, canadian-aboriginal, tifinagh
- U+030F COMBINING DOUBLE GRAVE ACCENT: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0311 COMBINING INVERTED BREVE: try adding coptic
- U+0326 COMBINING COMMA BELOW: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+2021 DOUBLE DAGGER: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+2030 PER MILLE SIGN: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+FB00 LATIN SMALL LIGATURE FF: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+FB01 LATIN SMALL LIGATURE FI: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+FB02 LATIN SMALL LIGATURE FL: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+FB03 LATIN SMALL LIGATURE FFI: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+FB04 LATIN SMALL LIGATURE FFL: not included in any glyphset definition
Or you can add the above codepoints to one of the subsets supported by the font:
latin
,latin-ext
,menu
[code: unreachable-subsetting]
⚠️ Radley-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
The following codepoints supported by the font are not covered by any subsets defined in the font's metadata file, and will never be served. You can solve this by either manually adding additional subset declarations to METADATA.pb, or by editing the glyphset definitions.
- U+02C7 CARON: try adding one of: canadian-aboriginal, tifinagh
- U+02D8 BREVE: try adding canadian-aboriginal
- U+02D9 DOT ABOVE: try adding canadian-aboriginal
- U+02DB OGONEK: try adding canadian-aboriginal
- U+02DD DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0307 COMBINING DOT ABOVE: try adding one of: coptic, tai-le, malayalam, canadian-aboriginal, tifinagh
- U+030F COMBINING DOUBLE GRAVE ACCENT: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0311 COMBINING INVERTED BREVE: try adding coptic
- U+0326 COMBINING COMMA BELOW: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+FB00 LATIN SMALL LIGATURE FF: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+FB01 LATIN SMALL LIGATURE FI: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+FB02 LATIN SMALL LIGATURE FL: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+FB03 LATIN SMALL LIGATURE FFI: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+FB04 LATIN SMALL LIGATURE FFL: not included in any glyphset definition
Or you can add the above codepoints to one of the subsets supported by the font:
latin
,latin-ext
,menu
[code: unreachable-subsetting]
Check copyright namerecords match license file.
⚠️ Radley-Italic.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=1, enc=0, name=13] [code: http-in-description]
- ⚠️ WARN
Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=3, enc=1, name=13] [code: http-in-description]
- ⚠️ WARN
For now we're still accepting http URLs, but you should consider using https instead. [code: http]
⚠️ Radley-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=1, enc=0, name=13] [code: http-in-description]
- ⚠️ WARN
Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=3, enc=1, name=13] [code: http-in-description]
- ⚠️ WARN
For now we're still accepting http URLs, but you should consider using https instead. [code: http]
License URL matches License text on name table?
⚠️ Radley-Italic.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=1, enc=0, name=13] [code: http-in-description]
- ⚠️ WARN
Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=1, enc=0, name=13] [code: http-in-description]
- ⚠️ WARN
Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=3, enc=1, name=13] [code: http-in-description]
- ⚠️ WARN
Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=1, enc=0, name=13] [code: http-in-description]
- ⚠️ WARN
Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=3, enc=1, name=13] [code: http-in-description]
- ⚠️ WARN
Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=1, enc=0, name=14] [code: http-in-license-info]
- ⚠️ WARN
Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=3, enc=1, name=14] [code: http-in-license-info]
- ⚠️ WARN
For now we're still accepting http URLs, but you should consider using https instead. [code: http]
⚠️ Radley-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=1, enc=0, name=13] [code: http-in-description]
- ⚠️ WARN
Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=1, enc=0, name=13] [code: http-in-description]
- ⚠️ WARN
Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=3, enc=1, name=13] [code: http-in-description]
- ⚠️ WARN
Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=1, enc=0, name=13] [code: http-in-description]
- ⚠️ WARN
Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=3, enc=1, name=13] [code: http-in-description]
- ⚠️ WARN
Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=1, enc=0, name=14] [code: http-in-license-info]
- ⚠️ WARN
Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=3, enc=1, name=14] [code: http-in-license-info]
- ⚠️ WARN
For now we're still accepting http URLs, but you should consider using https instead. [code: http]
Font has old ttfautohint applied?
⚠️ Radley-Italic.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
ttfautohint used in font = 1.6; latest = 1.8.4; Need to re-run with the newer version! [code: old-ttfa]
⚠️ Radley-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
ttfautohint used in font = 1.6; latest = 1.8.4; Need to re-run with the newer version! [code: old-ttfa]
METADATA.pb: Check URL on copyright string is the same as in repository_url field.
🔥 Radley-Italic.ttf
- 🔥 FAIL
Value of repository_url field is
But font copyright string has: https://github.com/googlefonts/RadleyFont and https://github.com/googlefonts/RadleyFont [code: mismatch]
🔥 Radley-Regular.ttf
- 🔥 FAIL
Value of repository_url field is
But font copyright string has: https://github.com/googlefonts/RadleyFont and https://github.com/googlefonts/RadleyFont [code: mismatch]
PPEM must be an integer on hinted fonts.
🔥 Radley-Italic.ttf
- 🔥 FAIL
This is a hinted font, so it must have bit 3 set on the flags of the head table, so that PPEM values will be rounded into an integer value.
This can be accomplished by using the 'gftools fix-hinting' command:
# create virtualenv python3 -m venv venv # activate virtualenv source venv/bin/activate # install gftools pip install git+https://www.github.com/googlefonts/tools
[code: bad-flags]
🔥 Radley-Regular.ttf
- 🔥 FAIL
This is a hinted font, so it must have bit 3 set on the flags of the head table, so that PPEM values will be rounded into an integer value.
This can be accomplished by using the 'gftools fix-hinting' command:
# create virtualenv python3 -m venv venv # activate virtualenv source venv/bin/activate # install gftools pip install git+https://www.github.com/googlefonts/tools
[code: bad-flags]
Are there caret positions declared for every ligature?
⚠️ Radley-Italic.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
This font lacks caret position values for ligature glyphs on its GDEF table. [code: lacks-caret-pos]
⚠️ Radley-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
This font lacks caret position values for ligature glyphs on its GDEF table. [code: lacks-caret-pos]
Is there kerning info for non-ligated sequences?
⚠️ Radley-Italic.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:
- f + i - i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]
⚠️ Radley-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:
- f + i - i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]
A static fonts directory with at least two fonts must accompany variable fonts
⚠️ Radley-Italic.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
Please consider adding a subdirectory called "static/" and including in it static font files. [code: missing]
⚠️ Radley-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
Please consider adding a subdirectory called "static/" and including in it static font files. [code: missing]
On a family update, the DESCRIPTION.en_us.html file should ideally also be updated.
⚠️ Radley-Italic.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
The DESCRIPTION.en_us.html file in this family has not changed in comparison to the latest font release on the google/fonts github repo. Please consider mentioning note-worthy improvements made to the family recently. [code: description-not-updated]
⚠️ Radley-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
The DESCRIPTION.en_us.html file in this family has not changed in comparison to the latest font release on the google/fonts github repo. Please consider mentioning note-worthy improvements made to the family recently. [code: description-not-updated]
Ensure fonts have ScriptLangTags declared on the 'meta' table.
⚠️ Radley-Italic.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
⚠️ Radley-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
Section: Universal
🔥🔥🔥🔥⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️Font contains '.notdef' as its first glyph?
🔥 Radley-Italic.ttf
- 🔥 FAIL
The '.notdef' glyph should contain a drawing, but it is blank. [code: notdef-is-blank]
🔥 Radley-Regular.ttf
- 🔥 FAIL
The '.notdef' glyph should contain a drawing, but it is blank. [code: notdef-is-blank]
Check font contains no unreachable glyphs
⚠️ Radley-Italic.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- ck - foundryicon - tt
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
⚠️ Radley-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- Gcedilla - Ldotaccent - ck - ff - ffi - ffl - foundryicon - gcedilla - tt - yacute.001
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
Check if each glyph has the recommended amount of contours.
⚠️ Radley-Italic.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: quotedbl Contours detected: 4 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: w Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 - Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0 - Glyph name: Ecircumflex Contours detected: 1 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: Dcroat Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: lacute Contours detected: 1 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: Ldotaccent Contours detected: 1 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 - Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 - Glyph name: Scommaaccent Contours detected: 1 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: scommaaccent Contours detected: 1 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: uni021A Contours detected: 1 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: uni021B Contours detected: 1 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: perthousand Contours detected: 1 Expected: 6 or 7 - Glyph name: Dcroat Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: Ecircumflex Contours detected: 1 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 - Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: fi Contours detected: 1 Expected: 3 - Glyph name: lacute Contours detected: 1 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: perthousand Contours detected: 1 Expected: 6 or 7 - Glyph name: quotedbl Contours detected: 4 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0 - Glyph name: uni021A Contours detected: 1 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: uni021B Contours detected: 1 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 - Glyph name: w Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1
[code: contour-count]
⚠️ Radley-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0 - Glyph name: Dcroat Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: Lcaron Contours detected: 1 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 - Glyph name: Dcroat Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: Lcaron Contours detected: 1 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 - Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
[code: contour-count]
Does the font contain a soft hyphen?
⚠️ Radley-Italic.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]
⚠️ Radley-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]
Check math signs have the same width.
⚠️ Radley-Italic.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
The most common width is 914 among a set of 1 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though:
Width = 629: less
Width = 849: equal
Width = 669: greater
Width = 1296: logicalnot
Width = 917: plusminus
Width = 312: multiply
Width = 998: divide
Width = 1046: minus [code: width-outliers]
⚠️ Radley-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
The most common width is 1099 among a set of 2 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though:
Width = 626: greater, less
Width = 845: equal
Width = 1345: logicalnot
Width = 1098: multiply
Width = 1262: divide
Width = 1145: minus [code: width-outliers]
Check accent of Lcaron, dcaron, lcaron, tcaron (derived from com.google.fonts/check/alt_caron)
🔥 Radley-Italic.ttf
- 🔥 FAIL
Lcaron uses component quoteright. [code: bad-mark]
- 🔥 FAIL
dcaron uses component quoteright. [code: bad-mark]
- 🔥 FAIL
lcaron uses component comma. [code: bad-mark]
- 🔥 FAIL
tcaron uses component quoteright. [code: bad-mark]
🔥 Radley-Regular.ttf
- 🔥 FAIL
dcaron uses component quoteright. [code: bad-mark]
- 🔥 FAIL
lcaron uses component quoteright. [code: bad-mark]
- 🔥 FAIL
tcaron uses component quoteright. [code: bad-mark]
- ⚠️ WARN
Lcaron is decomposed and therefore could not be checked. Please check manually. [code: decomposed-outline]
Section: fontbakery.profiles.dsig
⚠️⚠️Does the font have a DSIG table?
⚠️ Radley-Italic.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
This font has a digital signature (DSIG table) which is only required - even if only a placeholder - on old programs like MS Office 2013 in order to work properly. The current recommendation is to completely remove the DSIG table. [code: found-DSIG]
⚠️ Radley-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
This font has a digital signature (DSIG table) which is only required - even if only a placeholder - on old programs like MS Office 2013 in order to work properly. The current recommendation is to completely remove the DSIG table. [code: found-DSIG]
Section: fontbakery.profiles.glyf
⚠️Check for points out of bounds.
⚠️ Radley-Italic.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
The following glyphs have coordinates which are out of bounds: * ('lcaron', 74, 204) * ('ldot', 74, 204) and ('uni01C9', 83, 204)
This happens a lot when points are not extremes, which is usually bad. However, fixing this alert by adding points on extremes may do more harm than good, especially with italics, calligraphic-script, handwriting, rounded and other fonts. So it is common to ignore this message. [code: points-out-of-bounds]
Section: Shaping Checks
⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩Ensure dotted circle glyph is present and can attach marks.
⚠️ Radley-Italic.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]
⚠️ Radley-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]
Ensure soft_dotted characters lose their dot when combined with marks that replace the dot.
⚠️ Radley-Italic.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: j̑
The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: i̇ i̦̇ j̇ j̏ j̦̇ j̦̏ j̦̑ į̇ į̏ į̑ į̦̇ į̦̏ į̦̑
Your font does not cover the following languages that require the soft-dotted feature: Belarusian (Cyrl, 10,064,517 speakers), Aghem (Latn, 38,843 speakers), Lithuanian (Latn, 2,357,094 speakers), Navajo (Latn, 166,319 speakers), Igbo (Latn, 27,823,640 speakers), Dutch (Latn, 31,709,104 speakers), Ukrainian (Cyrl, 29,273,587 speakers), Basaa (Latn, 332,940 speakers). [code: soft-dotted]
⚠️ Radley-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: j̑
The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: i̇ i̦̇ j̇ j̏ j̦̇ j̦̏ j̦̑ į̇ į̏ į̑ į̦̇ į̦̏ į̦̑
Your font does not cover the following languages that require the soft-dotted feature: Belarusian (Cyrl, 10,064,517 speakers), Aghem (Latn, 38,843 speakers), Lithuanian (Latn, 2,357,094 speakers), Navajo (Latn, 166,319 speakers), Igbo (Latn, 27,823,640 speakers), Dutch (Latn, 31,709,104 speakers), Ukrainian (Cyrl, 29,273,587 speakers), Basaa (Latn, 332,940 speakers). [code: soft-dotted]