FontBakery Check Report

If you think a check is flawed or have an idea for a check, please file an issue at https://github.com/fonttools/fontbakery/issues and remember to include a pointer to the repo and branch you're checking.

Summary

💥 ERROR	🔥 FAIL	⚠️ WARN	⏩ SKIP	ℹ️ INFO	✅ PASS
0	2	13	60	8	158
0%	1%	7%	34%	5%	90%

Note: The following loglevels were omitted in this report: SKIP, INFO, PASS, DEBUG

Meaning of check results:

💥 An ERROR is something wrong with FontBakery itself, possibly a bug.
🔥 A FAIL is a problem with the font that must be fixed.
⚠️ A WARN is something that you should consider addressing.
ℹ️ An INFO result simply prints something useful. Typically stats.
✅ A PASS means the font looks good for the given checking routine.
⏩ And a SKIP happens when the check does not apply to the given font.

If you get ERRORs, please help us improve the tool by reporting them at our issue tracker.

(but other kinds of bug reports and/or feature requests are also always welcome, of course!)

FontBakery version: 0.9.2

Section: Google Fonts

🔥⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️

Check Google Fonts glyph coverage.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/glyph_coverage>

🔥 Blaka-Regular.ttf

🔥 FAIL

Missing required codepoints:

- 0x02D9 (DOT ABOVE)


- 0x0132 (LATIN CAPITAL LIGATURE IJ)


- 0x016C (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH BREVE)


- 0x0133 (LATIN SMALL LIGATURE IJ)


- 0x016D (LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH BREVE)


- 0x02DD (DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT)


- 0x02C7 (CARON)


- 0x02D8 (BREVE)


- 0x02DB (OGONEK)

[code: missing-codepoints]

Check for codepoints not covered by METADATA subsets.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/metadata/unreachable_subsetting>

⚠️ Blaka-Regular.ttf

⚠️ WARN
The following codepoints supported by the font are not covered by any subsets defined in the font's metadata file, and will never be served. You can solve this by either manually adding additional subset declarations to METADATA.pb, or by editing the glyphset definitions.
- U+0300 COMBINING GRAVE ACCENT: try adding one of: cherokee, coptic, tai-le
- U+0301 COMBINING ACUTE ACCENT: try adding one of: cherokee, tifinagh, coptic, tai-le
- U+0302 COMBINING CIRCUMFLEX ACCENT: try adding one of: cherokee, tifinagh, coptic
- U+0303 COMBINING TILDE: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0304 COMBINING MACRON: try adding one of: cherokee, tifinagh, gothic, coptic
- U+0306 COMBINING BREVE: try adding tifinagh
- U+0307 COMBINING DOT ABOVE: try adding one of: tifinagh, canadian-aboriginal, malayalam, tai-le, coptic
- U+0308 COMBINING DIAERESIS: try adding one of: tai-le, gothic, coptic
- U+030A COMBINING RING ABOVE: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+030B COMBINING DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT: try adding cherokee
- U+030C COMBINING CARON: try adding one of: cherokee, tai-le
- U+0312 COMBINING TURNED COMMA ABOVE: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0326 COMBINING COMMA BELOW: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0327 COMBINING CEDILLA: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0328 COMBINING OGONEK: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0615 ARABIC SMALL HIGH TAH: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+066E ARABIC LETTER DOTLESS BEH: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+066F ARABIC LETTER DOTLESS QAF: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+06A1 ARABIC LETTER DOTLESS FEH: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+2190 LEFTWARDS ARROW: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+2192 RIGHTWARDS ARROW: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+2260 NOT EQUAL TO: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+2264 LESS-THAN OR EQUAL TO: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+2265 GREATER-THAN OR EQUAL TO: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+25CA LOZENGE: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+FB01 LATIN SMALL LIGATURE FI: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+FB02 LATIN SMALL LIGATURE FL: not included in any glyphset definition
Or you can add the above codepoints to one of the subsets supported by the font: arabic, latin, latin-ext, menu [code: unreachable-subsetting]

Check copyright namerecords match license file.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/name/license>

⚠️ Blaka-Regular.ttf

⚠️ WARN
Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=3, enc=1, name=13] [code: http-in-description]
⚠️ WARN
For now we're still accepting http URLs, but you should consider using https instead. [code: http]

License URL matches License text on name table?

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/name/license_url>

⚠️ Blaka-Regular.ttf

⚠️ WARN
Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=3, enc=1, name=13] [code: http-in-description]
⚠️ WARN
Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=3, enc=1, name=13] [code: http-in-description]
⚠️ WARN
Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=3, enc=1, name=13] [code: http-in-description]
⚠️ WARN
Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=3, enc=1, name=14] [code: http-in-license-info]
⚠️ WARN
For now we're still accepting http URLs, but you should consider using https instead. [code: http]

Are there caret positions declared for every ligature?

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/ligature_carets>

⚠️ Blaka-Regular.ttf

⚠️ WARN
This font lacks caret positioning values for these ligature glyphs: - f_f - f_f_i - f_f_l - fi - fl

[code: incomplete-caret-pos-data]

Is there kerning info for non-ligated sequences?

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/kerning_for_non_ligated_sequences>

⚠️ Blaka-Regular.ttf

⚠️ WARN
GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:
```
- f + f

- f + i

- i + f

- f + l

- l + f

- i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]
```

A static fonts directory with at least two fonts must accompany variable fonts

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/repo/vf_has_static_fonts>

⚠️ Blaka-Regular.ttf

⚠️ WARN
Please consider adding a subdirectory called "static/" and including in it static font files. [code: missing]

Ensure fonts have ScriptLangTags declared on the 'meta' table.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/meta/script_lang_tags>

⚠️ Blaka-Regular.ttf

⚠️ WARN
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

Section: Universal

🔥⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩ℹ️ℹ️

Check font contains no unreachable glyphs

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/unreachable_glyphs>

⚠️ Blaka-Regular.ttf

⚠️ WARN

The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:

- dotbelowar

- dotcenterar

- gafsarkashcenterar

- hamzacenterar

- threedotsupbelowar

- threedotsupcenterar

- twodotshorizontalabovear

- twodotshorizontalbelowar

- twodotsverticalbelowar

- uni0627.fina.short

- uni0627.short

[code: unreachable-glyphs]

Check if each glyph has the recommended amount of contours.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/contour_count>

⚠️ Blaka-Regular.ttf

⚠️ WARN

This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.

The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:

- Glyph name: dieresis	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0

- Glyph name: Adieresis	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 4

- Glyph name: Edieresis	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 3

- Glyph name: Idieresis	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 3

- Glyph name: Odieresis	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 4

- Glyph name: Udieresis	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 3

- Glyph name: germandbls	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: adieresis	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 4

- Glyph name: edieresis	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 4

- Glyph name: idieresis	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 3

- Glyph name: odieresis	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 4

- Glyph name: oslash	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 3

- Glyph name: udieresis	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 3

- Glyph name: ydieresis	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 3

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: eogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: OE	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: oe	Contours detected: 4	Expected: 3

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: Ydieresis	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 3

- Glyph name: uni0308	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: Wdieresis	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 3

- Glyph name: wdieresis	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 3

- Glyph name: uni1E9E	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: lozenge	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: Adieresis	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 4

- Glyph name: Edieresis	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 3

- Glyph name: Idieresis	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 3

- Glyph name: OE	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: Odieresis	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 4

- Glyph name: Udieresis	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 3

- Glyph name: Uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: Wdieresis	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 3

- Glyph name: Ydieresis	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 3

- Glyph name: adieresis	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 4

- Glyph name: aogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: dieresis	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: edieresis	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 4

- Glyph name: eogonek	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: fi	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 3

- Glyph name: germandbls	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: idieresis	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 3

- Glyph name: lozenge	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: odieresis	Contours detected: 3	Expected: 4

- Glyph name: oe	Contours detected: 4	Expected: 3

- Glyph name: oslash	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 3

- Glyph name: udieresis	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 3

- Glyph name: uni00AD	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 0

- Glyph name: uni0308	Contours detected: 1	Expected: 2

- Glyph name: uni1E9E	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: uogonek	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 1

- Glyph name: wdieresis	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 3

- Glyph name: ydieresis	Contours detected: 2	Expected: 3

[code: contour-count]

Does the font contain a soft hyphen?

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/soft_hyphen>

⚠️ Blaka-Regular.ttf

⚠️ WARN
This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]

Check math signs have the same width.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/math_signs_width>

⚠️ Blaka-Regular.ttf

⚠️ WARN
The most common width is 375 among a set of 5 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though:

Width = 600: plus

Width = 364: greater, less

Width = 572: logicalnot

Width = 465: plusminus

Width = 416: multiply

Width = 415: divide [code: width-outliers]

Check accent of Lcaron, dcaron, lcaron, tcaron (derived from com.google.fonts/check/alt_caron)

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/alt_caron:googlefonts>

🔥 Blaka-Regular.ttf

🔥 FAIL
Lcaron uses component uni030C. [code: wrong-mark]
🔥 FAIL
dcaron uses component uni030C. [code: wrong-mark]
🔥 FAIL
lcaron uses component uni030C. [code: wrong-mark]
🔥 FAIL
tcaron uses component uni030C. [code: wrong-mark]

Section: Shaping Checks

⚠️⚠️⏩⏩⏩

Ensure dotted circle glyph is present and can attach marks.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/dotted_circle>

⚠️ Blaka-Regular.ttf

⚠️ WARN
No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]

Ensure soft_dotted characters lose their dot when combined with marks that replace the dot.

Check ID: <FontBakeryCheck:com.google.fonts/check/soft_dotted>

⚠️ Blaka-Regular.ttf

⚠️ WARN
The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̂ į̃ į̄ į̌

The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: ĩ̦ ĭ̦ i̦̇ i̦̊ i̦̋ ǐ̦ i̦̒ j̦̀ j̦́ ĵ̦ j̦̃ j̦̄ j̦̆ j̦̇ j̦̈ j̦̊ j̦̋ ǰ̦ j̦̒ į̆

Your font fully covers the following languages that require the soft-dotted feature: Dutch (Latn, 31,709,104 speakers).

Your font does not cover the following languages that require the soft-dotted feature: Igbo (Latn, 27,823,640 speakers), Basaa (Latn, 332,940 speakers), Belarusian (Cyrl, 10,064,517 speakers), Navajo (Latn, 166,319 speakers), Aghem (Latn, 38,843 speakers), Ukrainian (Cyrl, 29,273,587 speakers), Lithuanian (Latn, 2,357,094 speakers). [code: soft-dotted]