If you think a check is flawed or have an idea for a check, please file an issue at https://github.com/fonttools/fontbakery/issues and remember to include a pointer to the repo and branch you're checking.
Summary
💥 ERROR | 🔥 FAIL | ⚠️ WARN | ⏩ SKIP | ℹ️ INFO | ✅ PASS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 4 | 19 | 61 | 8 | 149 |
0% | 2% | 11% | 34% | 4% | 84% |
Note: The following loglevels were omitted in this report: SKIP, INFO, PASS, DEBUG
Meaning of check results:
- 💥 An ERROR is something wrong with FontBakery itself, possibly a bug.
- 🔥 A FAIL is a problem with the font that must be fixed.
- ⚠️ A WARN is something that you should consider addressing.
- ℹ️ An INFO result simply prints something useful. Typically stats.
- ✅ A PASS means the font looks good for the given checking routine.
- ⏩ And a SKIP happens when the check does not apply to the given font.
If you get ERRORs, please help us improve the tool by reporting them at our issue tracker.
(but other kinds of bug reports and/or feature requests are also always welcome, of course!)
FontBakery version: 0.9.2
Section: Google Fonts
🔥🔥🔥⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️DESCRIPTION.en_us.html should end in a linebreak.
⚠️ BhuTukaExpandedOne-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
The last characther on DESCRIPTION.en_us.html is not a line-break. Please add it. [code: missing-eof-linebreak]
Checking OS/2 achVendID.
⚠️ BhuTukaExpandedOne-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
OS/2 VendorID value 'NONE' is not yet recognized. If you registered it recently, then it's safe to ignore this warning message. Otherwise, you should set it to your own unique 4 character code, and register it with Microsoft at https://www.microsoft.com/typography/links/vendorlist.aspx [code: unknown]
Check Google Fonts glyph coverage.
🔥 BhuTukaExpandedOne-Regular.ttf
- 🔥 FAIL
Missing required codepoints:
- 0x0132 (LATIN CAPITAL LIGATURE IJ) - 0x016C (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH BREVE) - 0x0133 (LATIN SMALL LIGATURE IJ) - 0x016D (LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH BREVE)
[code: missing-codepoints]
Check for codepoints not covered by METADATA subsets.
⚠️ BhuTukaExpandedOne-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
The following codepoints supported by the font are not covered by any subsets defined in the font's metadata file, and will never be served. You can solve this by either manually adding additional subset declarations to METADATA.pb, or by editing the glyphset definitions.
- U+02C7 CARON: try adding one of: canadian-aboriginal, tifinagh
- U+02D8 BREVE: try adding canadian-aboriginal
- U+02D9 DOT ABOVE: try adding canadian-aboriginal
- U+02DB OGONEK: try adding canadian-aboriginal
- U+02DD DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0300 COMBINING GRAVE ACCENT: try adding one of: coptic, cherokee, tai-le
- U+0301 COMBINING ACUTE ACCENT: try adding one of: coptic, cherokee, tifinagh, tai-le
- U+0303 COMBINING TILDE: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0309 COMBINING HOOK ABOVE: try adding tifinagh
- U+0394 GREEK CAPITAL LETTER DELTA: try adding greek
- U+03A9 GREEK CAPITAL LETTER OMEGA: try adding greek
- U+03BC GREEK SMALL LETTER MU: try adding greek
- U+03C0 GREEK SMALL LETTER PI: try adding greek
- U+0A43 : not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0A44 : not included in any glyphset definition
- U+201B SINGLE HIGH-REVERSED-9 QUOTATION MARK: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+2021 DOUBLE DAGGER: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+2030 PER MILLE SIGN: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+2126 OHM SIGN: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+212E ESTIMATED SYMBOL: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+2202 PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+2206 INCREMENT: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+220F N-ARY PRODUCT: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+2211 N-ARY SUMMATION: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+2219 BULLET OPERATOR: try adding tai-tham
- U+221A SQUARE ROOT: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+221E INFINITY: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+222B INTEGRAL: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+2248 ALMOST EQUAL TO: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+2260 NOT EQUAL TO: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+2264 LESS-THAN OR EQUAL TO: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+2265 GREATER-THAN OR EQUAL TO: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+25CA LOZENGE: not included in any glyphset definition
Or you can add the above codepoints to one of the subsets supported by the font:
gurmukhi
,latin
,latin-ext
,menu
[code: unreachable-subsetting]
Check copyright namerecords match license file.
⚠️ BhuTukaExpandedOne-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=3, enc=1, name=13] [code: http-in-description]
- ⚠️ WARN
For now we're still accepting http URLs, but you should consider using https instead. [code: http]
License URL matches License text on name table?
⚠️ BhuTukaExpandedOne-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=3, enc=1, name=13] [code: http-in-description]
- ⚠️ WARN
Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=3, enc=1, name=13] [code: http-in-description]
- ⚠️ WARN
Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=3, enc=1, name=13] [code: http-in-description]
- ⚠️ WARN
Please consider using HTTPS URLs at name table entry [plat=3, enc=1, name=14] [code: http-in-license-info]
- ⚠️ WARN
For now we're still accepting http URLs, but you should consider using https instead. [code: http]
Font has old ttfautohint applied?
⚠️ BhuTukaExpandedOne-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
ttfautohint used in font = 1.8.3; latest = 1.8.4; Need to re-run with the newer version! [code: old-ttfa]
METADATA.pb: Check URL on copyright string is the same as in repository_url field.
🔥 BhuTukaExpandedOne-Regular.ttf
- 🔥 FAIL
Value of repository_url field is
But font copyright string has: https://github.com/erinmclaughlin/BhuTuka-Extended-One [code: mismatch]
Are there caret positions declared for every ligature?
⚠️ BhuTukaExpandedOne-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
This font lacks caret position values for ligature glyphs on its GDEF table. [code: lacks-caret-pos]
Is there kerning info for non-ligated sequences?
⚠️ BhuTukaExpandedOne-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:
- f + i - i + l [code: lacks-kern-info]
A static fonts directory with at least two fonts must accompany variable fonts
⚠️ BhuTukaExpandedOne-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
Please consider adding a subdirectory called "static/" and including in it static font files. [code: missing]
Check font follows the Google Fonts vertical metric schema
🔥 BhuTukaExpandedOne-Regular.ttf
- 🔥 FAIL
The sum of hhea.ascender + abs(hhea.descender) + hhea.lineGap is 1008 when it should be at least 1200 [code: bad-hhea-range]
On a family update, the DESCRIPTION.en_us.html file should ideally also be updated.
⚠️ BhuTukaExpandedOne-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
The DESCRIPTION.en_us.html file in this family has not changed in comparison to the latest font release on the google/fonts github repo. Please consider mentioning note-worthy improvements made to the family recently. [code: description-not-updated]
Ensure Stylistic Sets have description.
⚠️ BhuTukaExpandedOne-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
The stylistic set ss01 lacks a description string on the 'name' table. [code: missing-description]
- ⚠️ WARN
The stylistic set ss02 lacks a description string on the 'name' table. [code: missing-description]
- ⚠️ WARN
The stylistic set ss03 lacks a description string on the 'name' table. [code: missing-description]
- ⚠️ WARN
The stylistic set ss04 lacks a description string on the 'name' table. [code: missing-description]
- ⚠️ WARN
The stylistic set ss05 lacks a description string on the 'name' table. [code: missing-description]
- ⚠️ WARN
The stylistic set ss06 lacks a description string on the 'name' table. [code: missing-description]
- ⚠️ WARN
The stylistic set ss07 lacks a description string on the 'name' table. [code: missing-description]
- ⚠️ WARN
The stylistic set ss08 lacks a description string on the 'name' table. [code: missing-description]
Ensure fonts have ScriptLangTags declared on the 'meta' table.
⚠️ BhuTukaExpandedOne-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
Section: Universal
⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩ℹ️ℹ️Check font contains no unreachable glyphs
⚠️ BhuTukaExpandedOne-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- CR - W.bold - doubledanda - grVa - grmOO.alt - grsignU - uni0259 - uni02B9 - uni02BA - uni02BB - uni030C.alt - uni0312 - uni0326 - uni0335 - uni0337 - uni0338 - uni1E9E - uni1EA8 - uni20BA - uni20BD - uni2113 - uni2120 - w.bold
[code: unreachable-glyphs]
Check if each glyph has the recommended amount of contours.
⚠️ BhuTukaExpandedOne-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: asterisk Contours detected: 5 Expected: 1 or 4 - Glyph name: Q Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0 - Glyph name: dagger Contours detected: 4 Expected: 1 or 2 - Glyph name: daggerdbl Contours detected: 7 Expected: 1 or 3 - Glyph name: estimated Contours detected: 5 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: Q Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: asterisk Contours detected: 5 Expected: 1 or 4 - Glyph name: dagger Contours detected: 4 Expected: 1 or 2 - Glyph name: daggerdbl Contours detected: 7 Expected: 1 or 3 - Glyph name: estimated Contours detected: 5 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: uni00AD Contours detected: 1 Expected: 0
[code: contour-count]
Does the font contain a soft hyphen?
⚠️ BhuTukaExpandedOne-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
This font has a 'Soft Hyphen' character. [code: softhyphen]
Check math signs have the same width.
⚠️ BhuTukaExpandedOne-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
The most common width is 638 among a set of 7 math glyphs. The following math glyphs have a different width, though:
Width = 576: greater, less
Width = 600: uni00F7
Width = 668: approxequal
Width = 546: lessequal, greaterequal [code: width-outliers]
Check accent of Lcaron, dcaron, lcaron, tcaron (derived from com.google.fonts/check/alt_caron)
⚠️ BhuTukaExpandedOne-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
Lcaron is decomposed and therefore could not be checked. Please check manually. [code: decomposed-outline]
- ⚠️ WARN
dcaron is decomposed and therefore could not be checked. Please check manually. [code: decomposed-outline]
- ⚠️ WARN
lcaron is decomposed and therefore could not be checked. Please check manually. [code: decomposed-outline]
- ⚠️ WARN
tcaron is decomposed and therefore could not be checked. Please check manually. [code: decomposed-outline]
Section: fontbakery.profiles.gdef
⚠️Check mark characters are in GDEF mark glyph class.
⚠️ BhuTukaExpandedOne-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
The following mark characters could be in the GDEF mark glyph class: grAdakbindi (U+0A01), grAddak (U+0A71), grBindi (U+0A02), grNukta (U+0A3C), grTippi (U+0A70), grUdaat (U+0A75), grVirama (U+0A4D), grYakash (U+0A51), grmAI (U+0A48), grmAU (U+0A4C), grmEE (U+0A47), grmOO (U+0A4B), grmU (U+0A41) and grmUU (U+0A42) [code: mark-chars]
Section: Shaping Checks
🔥⚠️⏩⏩⏩Ensure dotted circle glyph is present and can attach marks.
🔥 BhuTukaExpandedOne-Regular.ttf
- 🔥 FAIL
The following glyphs could not be attached to the dotted circle glyph:
- acutecomb - gravecomb - hookabovecomb - tildecomb [code: unattached-dotted-circle-marks]
Ensure soft_dotted characters lose their dot when combined with marks that replace the dot.
⚠️ BhuTukaExpandedOne-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
The dot of soft dotted characters used in orthographies must disappear in the following strings: į̀ į́ į̃
The dot of soft dotted characters should disappear in other cases, for example: į̉
Your font does not cover the following languages that require the soft-dotted feature: Ukrainian (Cyrl, 29,273,587 speakers), Dutch (Latn, 31,709,104 speakers), Aghem (Latn, 38,843 speakers), Belarusian (Cyrl, 10,064,517 speakers), Navajo (Latn, 166,319 speakers), Igbo (Latn, 27,823,640 speakers), Basaa (Latn, 332,940 speakers), Lithuanian (Latn, 2,357,094 speakers). [code: soft-dotted]