If you think a check is flawed or have an idea for a check, please file an issue at https://github.com/fonttools/fontbakery/issues and remember to include a pointer to the repo and branch you're checking.
Summary
💥 ERROR | 🔥 FAIL | ⚠️ WARN | ⏩ SKIP | ℹ️ INFO | ✅ PASS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 4 | 19 | 117 | 15 | 310 |
0% | 1% | 6% | 34% | 4% | 91% |
Note: The following loglevels were omitted in this report: SKIP, INFO, PASS, DEBUG
Meaning of check results:
- 💥 An ERROR is something wrong with FontBakery itself, possibly a bug.
- 🔥 A FAIL is a problem with the font that must be fixed.
- ⚠️ A WARN is something that you should consider addressing.
- ℹ️ An INFO result simply prints something useful. Typically stats.
- ✅ A PASS means the font looks good for the given checking routine.
- ⏩ And a SKIP happens when the check does not apply to the given font.
If you get ERRORs, please help us improve the tool by reporting them at our issue tracker.
(but other kinds of bug reports and/or feature requests are also always welcome, of course!)
FontBakery version: 0.9.2
Section: Google Fonts
🔥🔥⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️DESCRIPTION.en_us.html should end in a linebreak.
⚠️ Baskervville-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
The last characther on DESCRIPTION.en_us.html is not a line-break. Please add it. [code: missing-eof-linebreak]
⚠️ Baskervville-Italic.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
The last characther on DESCRIPTION.en_us.html is not a line-break. Please add it. [code: missing-eof-linebreak]
Check Google Fonts glyph coverage.
🔥 Baskervville-Regular.ttf
- 🔥 FAIL
Missing required codepoints:
- 0x0133 (LATIN SMALL LIGATURE IJ)
[code: missing-codepoints]
🔥 Baskervville-Italic.ttf
- 🔥 FAIL
Missing required codepoints:
- 0x0133 (LATIN SMALL LIGATURE IJ)
[code: missing-codepoints]
Check for codepoints not covered by METADATA subsets.
⚠️ Baskervville-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
The following codepoints supported by the font are not covered by any subsets defined in the font's metadata file, and will never be served. You can solve this by either manually adding additional subset declarations to METADATA.pb, or by editing the glyphset definitions.
- U+02C7 CARON: try adding one of: canadian-aboriginal, tifinagh
- U+02D8 BREVE: try adding canadian-aboriginal
- U+02D9 DOT ABOVE: try adding canadian-aboriginal
- U+02DB OGONEK: try adding canadian-aboriginal
- U+02DD DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0300 COMBINING GRAVE ACCENT: try adding one of: tai-le, cherokee, coptic
- U+0301 COMBINING ACUTE ACCENT: try adding one of: tai-le, tifinagh, cherokee, coptic
- U+0302 COMBINING CIRCUMFLEX ACCENT: try adding one of: tifinagh, cherokee, coptic
- U+0303 COMBINING TILDE: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0304 COMBINING MACRON: try adding one of: gothic, tifinagh, cherokee, coptic
- U+0306 COMBINING BREVE: try adding tifinagh
- U+0307 COMBINING DOT ABOVE: try adding one of: tai-le, tifinagh, malayalam, coptic, canadian-aboriginal
- U+0308 COMBINING DIAERESIS: try adding one of: tai-le, gothic, coptic
- U+030A COMBINING RING ABOVE: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+030B COMBINING DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT: try adding cherokee
- U+030C COMBINING CARON: try adding one of: cherokee, tai-le
- U+0312 COMBINING TURNED COMMA ABOVE: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0326 COMBINING COMMA BELOW: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0327 COMBINING CEDILLA: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0328 COMBINING OGONEK: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0335 COMBINING SHORT STROKE OVERLAY: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0336 COMBINING LONG STROKE OVERLAY: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0337 COMBINING SHORT SOLIDUS OVERLAY: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0338 COMBINING LONG SOLIDUS OVERLAY: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+2021 DOUBLE DAGGER: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+2030 PER MILLE SIGN: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+2205 EMPTY SET: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+221E INFINITY: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+2248 ALMOST EQUAL TO: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+2260 NOT EQUAL TO: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+2264 LESS-THAN OR EQUAL TO: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+2265 GREATER-THAN OR EQUAL TO: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+25C7 WHITE DIAMOND: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+25CA LOZENGE: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+FB01 LATIN SMALL LIGATURE FI: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+FB02 LATIN SMALL LIGATURE FL: not included in any glyphset definition
Or you can add the above codepoints to one of the subsets supported by the font:
latin
,latin-ext
,menu
[code: unreachable-subsetting]
⚠️ Baskervville-Italic.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
The following codepoints supported by the font are not covered by any subsets defined in the font's metadata file, and will never be served. You can solve this by either manually adding additional subset declarations to METADATA.pb, or by editing the glyphset definitions.
- U+02C7 CARON: try adding one of: tifinagh, canadian-aboriginal
- U+02D8 BREVE: try adding canadian-aboriginal
- U+02D9 DOT ABOVE: try adding canadian-aboriginal
- U+02DB OGONEK: try adding canadian-aboriginal
- U+02DD DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0300 COMBINING GRAVE ACCENT: try adding one of: coptic, cherokee, tai-le
- U+0301 COMBINING ACUTE ACCENT: try adding one of: coptic, tifinagh, cherokee, tai-le
- U+0302 COMBINING CIRCUMFLEX ACCENT: try adding one of: coptic, tifinagh, cherokee
- U+0303 COMBINING TILDE: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0304 COMBINING MACRON: try adding one of: coptic, tifinagh, gothic, cherokee
- U+0306 COMBINING BREVE: try adding tifinagh
- U+0307 COMBINING DOT ABOVE: try adding one of: tifinagh, canadian-aboriginal, coptic, tai-le, malayalam
- U+0308 COMBINING DIAERESIS: try adding one of: gothic, coptic, tai-le
- U+030A COMBINING RING ABOVE: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+030B COMBINING DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT: try adding cherokee
- U+030C COMBINING CARON: try adding one of: cherokee, tai-le
- U+0312 COMBINING TURNED COMMA ABOVE: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0326 COMBINING COMMA BELOW: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0327 COMBINING CEDILLA: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0328 COMBINING OGONEK: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0335 COMBINING SHORT STROKE OVERLAY: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0336 COMBINING LONG STROKE OVERLAY: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0337 COMBINING SHORT SOLIDUS OVERLAY: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+0338 COMBINING LONG SOLIDUS OVERLAY: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+2021 DOUBLE DAGGER: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+2030 PER MILLE SIGN: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+2205 EMPTY SET: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+221E INFINITY: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+2248 ALMOST EQUAL TO: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+2260 NOT EQUAL TO: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+2264 LESS-THAN OR EQUAL TO: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+2265 GREATER-THAN OR EQUAL TO: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+25CA LOZENGE: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+FB01 LATIN SMALL LIGATURE FI: not included in any glyphset definition
- U+FB02 LATIN SMALL LIGATURE FL: not included in any glyphset definition
Or you can add the above codepoints to one of the subsets supported by the font:
latin
,latin-ext
,menu
[code: unreachable-subsetting]
Are there caret positions declared for every ligature?
⚠️ Baskervville-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
This font lacks caret position values for ligature glyphs on its GDEF table. [code: lacks-caret-pos]
⚠️ Baskervville-Italic.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
This font lacks caret positioning values for these ligature glyphs: - f_f_b.liga - f_f_h.liga - f_f_j.liga - f_f_k.liga - f_f_l.liga - f_h.liga - f_j.liga - fl - t_t.liga
[code: incomplete-caret-pos-data]
Is there kerning info for non-ligated sequences?
⚠️ Baskervville-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:
- f + f - f + b - b + f - f + h - h + f - f + i - i + f - f + j - j + f - f + k - k + f - f + l - l + b - h + i - i + j - j + k - k + l [code: lacks-kern-info]
⚠️ Baskervville-Italic.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:
- f + f - f + b - b + f - f + h - h + f - f + i - i + f - f + j - j + f - f + k - k + f - f + l - l + b - h + i - i + j - j + k - k + l - l + t - t + t [code: lacks-kern-info]
A static fonts directory with at least two fonts must accompany variable fonts
⚠️ Baskervville-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
Please consider adding a subdirectory called "static/" and including in it static font files. [code: missing]
⚠️ Baskervville-Italic.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
Please consider adding a subdirectory called "static/" and including in it static font files. [code: missing]
On a family update, the DESCRIPTION.en_us.html file should ideally also be updated.
⚠️ Baskervville-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
The DESCRIPTION.en_us.html file in this family has not changed in comparison to the latest font release on the google/fonts github repo. Please consider mentioning note-worthy improvements made to the family recently. [code: description-not-updated]
⚠️ Baskervville-Italic.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
The DESCRIPTION.en_us.html file in this family has not changed in comparison to the latest font release on the google/fonts github repo. Please consider mentioning note-worthy improvements made to the family recently. [code: description-not-updated]
Ensure fonts have ScriptLangTags declared on the 'meta' table.
⚠️ Baskervville-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
⚠️ Baskervville-Italic.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]
Section: Universal
🔥🔥⚠️⚠️⚠️⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️ℹ️Checking OS/2 usWinAscent & usWinDescent.
🔥 Baskervville-Regular.ttf
- 🔥 FAIL
OS/2.usWinDescent value should be equal or greater than 300, but got 296 instead [code: descent]
🔥 Baskervville-Italic.ttf
- 🔥 FAIL
OS/2.usWinDescent value should be equal or greater than 300, but got 296 instead [code: descent]
Check if each glyph has the recommended amount of contours.
⚠️ Baskervville-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: yen Contours detected: 3 Expected: 1 or 2 - Glyph name: Eth Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: Dcroat Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: dcroat Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: hbar Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 - Glyph name: Lslash Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 - Glyph name: lslash Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 - Glyph name: oe Contours detected: 4 Expected: 3 - Glyph name: Tbar Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 - Glyph name: tbar Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 - Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 - Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 - Glyph name: daggerdbl Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 or 3 - Glyph name: Dcroat Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: Eth Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: Lslash Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 - Glyph name: Tbar Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 - Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 - Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: daggerdbl Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 or 3 - Glyph name: dcroat Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: fi Contours detected: 1 Expected: 3 - Glyph name: fl Contours detected: 1 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: hbar Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 - Glyph name: lslash Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 - Glyph name: oe Contours detected: 4 Expected: 3 - Glyph name: tbar Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 - Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 - Glyph name: yen Contours detected: 3 Expected: 1 or 2
[code: contour-count]
⚠️ Baskervville-Italic.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
This check inspects the glyph outlines and detects the total number of contours in each of them. The expected values are infered from the typical ammounts of contours observed in a large collection of reference font families. The divergences listed below may simply indicate a significantly different design on some of your glyphs. On the other hand, some of these may flag actual bugs in the font such as glyphs mapped to an incorrect codepoint. Please consider reviewing the design and codepoint assignment of these to make sure they are correct.
The following glyphs do not have the recommended number of contours:
- Glyph name: yen Contours detected: 3 Expected: 1 or 2 - Glyph name: Eth Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: Dcroat Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: dcroat Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: hbar Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 - Glyph name: Lslash Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 - Glyph name: lslash Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 - Glyph name: OE Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: oe Contours detected: 4 Expected: 3 - Glyph name: Tbar Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 - Glyph name: tbar Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 - Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 - Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 - Glyph name: daggerdbl Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 or 3 - Glyph name: Dcroat Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: Eth Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: Lslash Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 - Glyph name: OE Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: Tbar Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 - Glyph name: Uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 - Glyph name: aogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: daggerdbl Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 or 3 - Glyph name: dcroat Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: eogonek Contours detected: 3 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: fi Contours detected: 1 Expected: 3 - Glyph name: fl Contours detected: 1 Expected: 2 - Glyph name: hbar Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 - Glyph name: lslash Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 - Glyph name: oe Contours detected: 4 Expected: 3 - Glyph name: tbar Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 - Glyph name: uogonek Contours detected: 2 Expected: 1 - Glyph name: yen Contours detected: 3 Expected: 1 or 2
[code: contour-count]
Check accent of Lcaron, dcaron, lcaron, tcaron (derived from com.google.fonts/check/alt_caron)
⚠️ Baskervville-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
Lcaron is decomposed and therefore could not be checked. Please check manually. [code: decomposed-outline]
Section: Shaping Checks
⚠️⚠️⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩⏩Ensure dotted circle glyph is present and can attach marks.
⚠️ Baskervville-Regular.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]
⚠️ Baskervville-Italic.ttf
- ⚠️ WARN
No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]